2020
DOI: 10.3390/ph14010019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of the First 99mTc-Labelled Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Antagonist for Clinical Translation—Preclinical Assessment of Two Optimized Candidates

Abstract: Recently, radiolabelled antagonists targeting somatostatin receptors subtype 2 (SST2) in neuroendocrine neoplasms demonstrated certain superior properties over agonists. Within the ERA-PerMED project “TECANT” two 99mTc-Tetramine (N4)-derivatized SST2 antagonists (TECANT-1 and TECANT-2) were studied for the selection of the best candidate for clinical translation. Receptor-affinity, internalization and dissociation studies were performed in human embryonic kidney-293 (HEK293) cells transfected with the human SS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To retain high affinity, while ensuring low lipophilicity of the new tracers, a less lipophilic SiOH-moiety (formally a hydrolyzed SiFA) was preferred. For complexation of technetium-99m a tetraamine (N4) chelator was chosen, as this chelating system exhibits excellent in vivo stability and confers high hydrophilicity to peptidic radioligands [ 29 , 30 ]. A further advantage over N 3 S-based chelating systems such as mercaptoacetyltriserine is the absence of chemically reactive thiol-groups which might limit the shelf-live of radioligand precursors, an oftentimes neglected aspect in early radioligand development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To retain high affinity, while ensuring low lipophilicity of the new tracers, a less lipophilic SiOH-moiety (formally a hydrolyzed SiFA) was preferred. For complexation of technetium-99m a tetraamine (N4) chelator was chosen, as this chelating system exhibits excellent in vivo stability and confers high hydrophilicity to peptidic radioligands [ 29 , 30 ]. A further advantage over N 3 S-based chelating systems such as mercaptoacetyltriserine is the absence of chemically reactive thiol-groups which might limit the shelf-live of radioligand precursors, an oftentimes neglected aspect in early radioligand development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the alternative chelating system 6-carboxy-1,4,8,11-tetraazaundecane (N4) seems to be better suited to 99m Tc-based SST 2 antagonists. In fact, 99m Tc-labeled LM3 via N4 ([ 99m Tc]Tc-TECANT-1) has been selected as the first 99m Tc-based antagonist for clinical translation [ 48 ] under the ERAPerMED project “TECANT” (Ref No. ERAPERMED2018-125).…”
Section: Somatostatin Receptor Antagonists: Will They Make the Differ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, the % IA/g determined in mice was extrapolated to humans using the following equation: % IA per organ in humans = ([%IA/g in mice × mass of mice (kg)] × mass of human organ (g))/(total body mass (kg)). Time scaling was additionally applied to account for the faster kinetics in mice versus humans using the following equation: time in humans = time in mice × [mass of human (kg)/mass of mice] 1/4 [25]. The uptake values in mice were decay corrected for the adopted time points.…”
Section: Biodistribution and Tumor Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%