1963
DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177704243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of the Best Treatment in a Paired-Comparison Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paired comparison measurement determined which quadrant respondents expected to be most similar to their own with respect to the holistic set of behaviors of individuals in each quadrant. A forced-choice survey design reduced the possibility of first-place ties (Trawinski and David 1963).…”
Section: Sample and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paired comparison measurement determined which quadrant respondents expected to be most similar to their own with respect to the holistic set of behaviors of individuals in each quadrant. A forced-choice survey design reduced the possibility of first-place ties (Trawinski and David 1963).…”
Section: Sample and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the determined value no, one finds from Table 2 of Trawinski & David (1963) the corresponding number v = vo which, together with the outcome of the experiment of size (t, no) determines the discriminant relation x7 > xmaxv for separating the subset B from T. In these illustrations the respective integers are v = 26 and v = 13. Consider t treatments to be assessed in a paired comparison experiment for the purpose of retaining on the average in the selected subset B a certain number, say less than or equal to lt, when P* = 0-90.…”
Section: I4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tt}, so that B contains the superior member of T with probability not less than a pre-assigned number P*, was formulated for the case of paired comparisons on T by Trawinski & David (1963). Tt}, so that B contains the superior member of T with probability not less than a pre-assigned number P*, was formulated for the case of paired comparisons on T by Trawinski & David (1963).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%