2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1411-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of Socially Responsible Portfolios Using Hedonic Prices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach is in the spirit of Bilbao-Terol et al (2013), in the sense that we provide the investor with several possible portfolios not too far from the financial efficient frontier of the problem. In this way, the investor becomes aware of the difference between the financial performance of the proposed portfolios and the financially efficient ones that are better with regard to the financial goals.…”
Section: Portfolio Selection Under Financial and Social Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is in the spirit of Bilbao-Terol et al (2013), in the sense that we provide the investor with several possible portfolios not too far from the financial efficient frontier of the problem. In this way, the investor becomes aware of the difference between the financial performance of the proposed portfolios and the financially efficient ones that are better with regard to the financial goals.…”
Section: Portfolio Selection Under Financial and Social Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the study by Ballestero et al [60] suggested that ethical investments entail higher risk exposure. In their study, Bilbao-Terol et al [62] found that the financial penalties associated with SRIs are quite minor for higher risk-averse investors. Utz et al [66] revealed no support for lower financial performance or higher risk exposures of SRI funds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, most recently, the additional criterion that seems to be receiving the most consideration is social responsibility [42,57]. Over the past few years numerous papers on social responsibility in portfolio selection have been published [51,52,54,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. One of the most recent works on this subject comes from Utz et al [52] who extended the Markowitz model by complementing it with a social responsibility objective, in addition to the portfolio return and variance, thereby making the traditional efficient frontier a surface.…”
Section: The Application Of Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and propose an example for SR investors, showing that their algorithm can outperform standard portfolio strategies for multi-criteria DMs. Bilbao et al (2013) propose an approach for portfolio selection based on the market valuation of the social responsibility of financial assets and multi-objective programming tools in order to obtain an optimal SRI portfolio with a financial performance similar to an optimal portfolio without ESG considerations. Calvo et al (2014) consider the social responsibility of the portfolio as an additional secondary non-financial goal in the mean-variance portfolio selection model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%