2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of reference genes for normalization of real-time PCR data in minipig heart failure model and evaluation of TNF-α mRNA expression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total RNA was collected (RNeasy Kit, Qiagen), and cDNA was generated using Oligo d(T) (Invitrogen) and MML-V reverse transcriptase (Promega). PCR was performed using primers specific for GPR107 and the housekeeping gene, HPRT-1 (12). Amplicons were separated on a 1% agarose gel, and imaged using a FujiFilm Luminescent Image Analyzer (LAS-3000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total RNA was collected (RNeasy Kit, Qiagen), and cDNA was generated using Oligo d(T) (Invitrogen) and MML-V reverse transcriptase (Promega). PCR was performed using primers specific for GPR107 and the housekeeping gene, HPRT-1 (12). Amplicons were separated on a 1% agarose gel, and imaged using a FujiFilm Luminescent Image Analyzer (LAS-3000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative real-time PCR (MyIQ, Bio-Rad) was performed with SYBR green (Bio-Rad) (62). Target gene mRNA levels were expressed relative to the housekeeping gene GAPDH as an endogenous control (39).…”
Section: Quantitative Real-time Pcr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was very important to select the appropriate reference genes in the realtime PCR. Thus, a reference gene group including β-actin, TATA box binding protein (TBP) and GAPDH was chosen for both in vivo and in vitro studies according to the relevant references (18,21,(24)(25)(26)(27). In addition, the geometric mean of the expression of the reference genes was used to confirm the robustness of experimental data (28).…”
Section: Quantitative Real-time Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%