2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-020-04847-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of Process Parameters for Near-Net Shape Deposition in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing by Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two experienced users were utilized to program the robotic path using both OP and OLP robotic approaches, where the workpiece was kept in the same fixed position at all times relative to the robotic manipulator. The comparison metrics that were used were the path planning time, the number of teaching points required, the need to teach a base for motion planning, and the ability to adapt to the material overbuild of the WAAM manufacturing sample [ 38 ]. Table 3 demonstrates these results, where the proposed kinesthetic guidance approach proved robust and, overall, superior across all the comparison metrics.…”
Section: Quantitative Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two experienced users were utilized to program the robotic path using both OP and OLP robotic approaches, where the workpiece was kept in the same fixed position at all times relative to the robotic manipulator. The comparison metrics that were used were the path planning time, the number of teaching points required, the need to teach a base for motion planning, and the ability to adapt to the material overbuild of the WAAM manufacturing sample [ 38 ]. Table 3 demonstrates these results, where the proposed kinesthetic guidance approach proved robust and, overall, superior across all the comparison metrics.…”
Section: Quantitative Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Imani et al (2018) demonstrated the ability of an ANN to predict laser powder bed fusion process parameter regimes using layer wise optical images. Kumar and Maji (2020) in their recent work employed a Genetic Algorithm-based (GA) framework for extracting the optimal process parameters of wire-arc additive manufacturing process. Similarly, Vaissier et al (2019) demonstrated the efficacy of using GA for optimizing support structure generation in additively manufactured parts.…”
Section: Prior Work Challenges and Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, WAAM has garnered considerable research attention, yet it has seen minimal industrial applications. Numerous issues with geometric accuracy, poor surface consistency, layer unevenness, poor repeatability, and the need for post-processing to complete a part [7,8]. Over the last decade, extensive research has been conducted on process details such as forming precision, surface quality, microstructure, mechanical properties, and residual stress to improve quality and meet industrial needs [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, optimizing the process parameters is crucial to achieving superior component quality and mechanical properties. Kumar and Maji [8] discussed optimizing the selection of parameters for near net shape deposition to minimize void and excess material in WAAM by the Genetic Algorithm. Bead geometry parameters, width, height, and cross-section were expressed in process parameters like voltage, wire feed rate, torch speed, and gas flow rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%