2019
DOI: 10.3390/plants8090349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of Parental Material to Maximize Heterosis Using SNP and SilicoDarT Markers in Maize

Abstract: The chief aim of plant breeding is to improve varieties so as to increase their yield and breeding traits. One of the first stages of breeding is the selection of parental forms from the available gene pool of existing varieties. To date, costly and laborious methods based on multiple crossbreeding and phenotypic selection have been necessary to properly assess genetic resources in terms of productivity, quality parameters, and susceptibility to biotic and abiotic stressors. The often long and complicated bree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tomkowiak et al [19] examined inbred maize lines and consequently identified three SilicoDArT markers, 4591115, 7059939, and 5587991, related to the size of crop structure features. Tomkowiak et al [20] also tested SNP and SilicoDArT molecular markers on the same pool of plant materials in the context of selecting the parental components for heterosis crossing, and concluded that such markers could be useful in selecting plant material. Coors et al [21] stated that predicting the effect of heterosis between groups of germplasm showing genetic similarity was not possible on the basis of the genetic distance determined using the DNA markers, but should be determined in the field experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomkowiak et al [19] examined inbred maize lines and consequently identified three SilicoDArT markers, 4591115, 7059939, and 5587991, related to the size of crop structure features. Tomkowiak et al [20] also tested SNP and SilicoDArT molecular markers on the same pool of plant materials in the context of selecting the parental components for heterosis crossing, and concluded that such markers could be useful in selecting plant material. Coors et al [21] stated that predicting the effect of heterosis between groups of germplasm showing genetic similarity was not possible on the basis of the genetic distance determined using the DNA markers, but should be determined in the field experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive correlations between GD and heterosis were reported in maize, wheat, pearl millet, Brassica napus, Brassica oleracea, cacao, and rapeseed. In maize, the GD between parental components, as determined by the SNP and SilicoDArT markers was signi cantly correlated with the heterosis effect observed in the majority of the yield structure features, as well as the yield itself [12]. Nie et al reported a signi cant correlation between GD and MPH of 1000-grain weight in wheat [13].…”
Section: Genetic Distance Between Parents Assessed By Ssr and Snp Marmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…With the aim of saving resources, the genetic distance (GD) inferred from molecular markers has been suggested as a promising tool for hybrid performance prediction and recognition of heterotic groups [8][9][10]. Recently, several reports concerning maize, rice, wheat have suggested the possibility of using the molecular markers (such as SSR and SNP) to select parental materials for heterosis crosses [6,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic distances inferred from molecular markers were suggested by Melchinger [16] as a promising tool for grouping germplasm sharing similar genomes and identifying heterotic patterns. In fact, most of the studies carried out in maize showed that there is a clear and positive correlation between genetic divergence of parental lines and potential heterosis, but Tomkowiak et al [17] highlighted that the magnitude of the phenomenon could be lower than expected. Thus, while the genetic divergence is a necessary condition, at the same time, it could not be a sufficient guarantee of heterotic performances [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%