2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/1049257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of Neural Oscillatory Features for Human Stress Classification with Single Channel EEG Headset

Abstract: A study on classification of psychological stress in humans using electroencephalography (EEG) is presented. The stress is classified using a correlation-based feature subset selection method that efficiently reduces the feature vector length. In this study, twenty-eight participants are involved by filling in the perceived stress scale-10 (PSS-10) questionnaire and their EEG is also recorded in closed eye condition to measure the baseline stress. The recorded data is labelled on the basis of the stress level … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was an obvious variation in the treated frequency ranges. Thus, the highest accuracy was acquired when dealing with seven bands where they got 85.20% for SVM [ 108 ] comparing with the three bands 78.57% [ 54 ] and four bands 83.33% [ 106 ] that have used same classifier. Besides, the lowest performance was related to two frequency fields with 71.4% accuracy with NB classifier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There was an obvious variation in the treated frequency ranges. Thus, the highest accuracy was acquired when dealing with seven bands where they got 85.20% for SVM [ 108 ] comparing with the three bands 78.57% [ 54 ] and four bands 83.33% [ 106 ] that have used same classifier. Besides, the lowest performance was related to two frequency fields with 71.4% accuracy with NB classifier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pearson’s correlation-based captures linear, time-domain dependencies among EEG signals. It could be found over a single epoch or over several epochs, and it is calculated using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient, cross-covariance, and auto-covariance of EEG signals [ 54 ]. Therefore, increasing the value for the Pearson correlation coefficient from (−1) to (1) indicates intense connections between brain regions.…”
Section: Eeg Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These applications include brain monitoring in naturalistic settings and in real-time (Hu et al, 2015;Jebelli et al, 2017), brain-computer interfaces (BCI; Park et al, 2020), neurofeedback interventions (Angelakis et al, 2007;Quaedflieg et al, 2016;Brandmeyer and Delorme, 2020a), neuromarketing (Cartocci et al, 2018;Ramsøy et al, 2018), or neuroaesthetics research (i.e., the science studying the biological underpinnings of aesthetic experience; Cheung et al, 2019;Cartocci et al, 2021). While these EEG systems can have inferior hardware capacities than conventional ones, recent technological and algorithmic advancements make the detection and measurement of mental states increasingly reliable (Wu et al, 2017), with as few as a single EEG channel (Umar Saeed et al, 2018;Arpaia et al, 2020;Mahmoodi et al, 2021). Additionally, these systems can easily combine other physiological measures such as electrocardiography (ECG) or galvanic skin response (GSR) to improve the efficacy of mental states detection (e.g., Ahn et al, 2019).…”
Section: Sample Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%