Abstract:Virtual environments (VEs) are presently being used to treat military personnel suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In an attempt to reduce the risk of PTSD, VEs may also be useful for stress management training (SMT) to practice skills under stress, but such use necessitates the development of relevant stress-inducing scenarios and storyboards. This article describes the procedures followed to select which VEs could be built for the Canadian Forces. A review and analysis of the available lite… Show more
“…performance and well-being (e.g., Bouchard, Baus, Bernier, & McCreary, 2010;Dekel, Solomon, Ginzburg, & Neria, 2003;Farley & Catano, 2006;Nisenbaum, Barett, Reyes, & Reeves, 2000;Vasterling et al, 2010), the cumulative effects of operational stressors or combat exposure (e.g., Bartone, Adler, & Vaitkus, 1998;Dohrenwend et al, 2006;Engelhard & van den Hout, 2007; Office of the Surgeon Multinational Force-Iraq & Office of the Surgeon General U.S. Army Medical Command, 2006), and external protective factors, such as leadership and cohesion (e.g., Farley & Veitch, 2003; Office of the Surgeon Multinational Force-Iraq, 2006). Surprisingly little research has been dedicated to understanding the psychological mechanisms responsible for varied reactions to combat stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is clear that risk for psychological distress, especially posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; Bouchard et al, 2010;Dohrenwend et al, 2006;Engelhard & van den Hout, 2007), increases with combat exposure, the nature of this relationship is more complex. Individual differences in mood or resilience (Riolli, Savicki, & Spain, 2010), personality (e.g., neuroticism; Engelhard & van den Hout, 2007), or self-efficacy (Jex, Bliese, Buzzell, & Primeau, 2001) may mediate and/or moderate the relationship, though these factors may also contribute to how the events are appraised.…”
Applying Cognitive Appraisal Theory (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), this study sought to determine the mediating effect of cognitive appraisal on combat exposure and psychological distress. A total of 3,002 military personnel completed measures of combat exposure, cognitive appraisal of combat-related events, and psychological distress either during or soon after combat operations in Afghanistan. Bootstrapping was employed to test the mediation model. Cognitive appraisal mediated the relationship between combat exposure and psychological distress, suggesting that the impact of a potentially stressful event on well-being is contingent on one's appraisal of that event. Implications for future research and training are presented.While the effects of military operational stressors on soldiers have received much attention as of late, research in this area has been largely limited to identifying types of stressors (e.g.
“…performance and well-being (e.g., Bouchard, Baus, Bernier, & McCreary, 2010;Dekel, Solomon, Ginzburg, & Neria, 2003;Farley & Catano, 2006;Nisenbaum, Barett, Reyes, & Reeves, 2000;Vasterling et al, 2010), the cumulative effects of operational stressors or combat exposure (e.g., Bartone, Adler, & Vaitkus, 1998;Dohrenwend et al, 2006;Engelhard & van den Hout, 2007; Office of the Surgeon Multinational Force-Iraq & Office of the Surgeon General U.S. Army Medical Command, 2006), and external protective factors, such as leadership and cohesion (e.g., Farley & Veitch, 2003; Office of the Surgeon Multinational Force-Iraq, 2006). Surprisingly little research has been dedicated to understanding the psychological mechanisms responsible for varied reactions to combat stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is clear that risk for psychological distress, especially posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; Bouchard et al, 2010;Dohrenwend et al, 2006;Engelhard & van den Hout, 2007), increases with combat exposure, the nature of this relationship is more complex. Individual differences in mood or resilience (Riolli, Savicki, & Spain, 2010), personality (e.g., neuroticism; Engelhard & van den Hout, 2007), or self-efficacy (Jex, Bliese, Buzzell, & Primeau, 2001) may mediate and/or moderate the relationship, though these factors may also contribute to how the events are appraised.…”
Applying Cognitive Appraisal Theory (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), this study sought to determine the mediating effect of cognitive appraisal on combat exposure and psychological distress. A total of 3,002 military personnel completed measures of combat exposure, cognitive appraisal of combat-related events, and psychological distress either during or soon after combat operations in Afghanistan. Bootstrapping was employed to test the mediation model. Cognitive appraisal mediated the relationship between combat exposure and psychological distress, suggesting that the impact of a potentially stressful event on well-being is contingent on one's appraisal of that event. Implications for future research and training are presented.While the effects of military operational stressors on soldiers have received much attention as of late, research in this area has been largely limited to identifying types of stressors (e.g.
“…Each scenario required the participant to respond to five stressful decision events with varying levels of unpredictability, uncontrollability, novelty, duration and intensity, five dimensions shown to impact stress response [38] [39]. In order to ensure each participant received a novel stressor during each stress induction phase, the stress induction tech- …”
The objective of this study was to measure the effects of a condensed 90 minute Biofeedback Training (BFT) method on stress response and decision making performance under stress. Forty one novice male participants received either BFT training, which incorporated diaphragmatic breathing with Stress Inoculation Training (SIT), or a control training task. Participants completed pre-and post-training assessments which incorporated a socio evaluative stress induction method followed immediately by performance of a simulation-based decision making under stress scenario. Stress was assessed using real-time physiological measures of the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) response and cortisol measures of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis stress response. Perceived stress was measured using the state portion of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory and decision making performance was assessed during scenario performance. Results showed that participants in the BFT condition experienced a significant reduction in cortisol from pre-training to post-training, while the control group did not. However, BFT participants did not experience statistically significant reductions in ANS stress response or in perceived stress compared to the control group. Participants in the biofeedback group experienced greater improvements in performance from pre-training to post-training compared to the control group; however, these results only approached statistical significance (p = 0.09). These results suggest that the condensed BFT method has the potential to impart the knowledge and skills necessary to implement the biofeedback-based coping mechanisms; however, it may require additional practice time to allow the technique to be utilized more effectively.
“…For the connection between the idea of virtual on one hand and the idea of trauma and life story on the other hand, the study focuses on the concept of transfer of experience (Georgieva, 2011b) from the virtual space to the real life in the form of life experiences. It also discusses the immersiveness of the virtual space and the application of the feeling of presence in PTSD therapy (Mantovani and Riva, 1999;Bouchard et al, 2010).…”
This study discusses the concept of virtual selves created in the virtual spaces [e.g. social network services or virtual reality (VR)]. It analyzes the activities in the different virtual spaces and claims that experience gained there can be transferred to real life. In respect to that, the effects of the VR treatment on the self as well as the concept of creating a life story are analyzed as interconnected. The research question which arises from these considerations is how to look at psychological trauma in order to explain the effectiveness of the usage of VR for treatment of traumatic disorders. The proposal in the study is to see trauma as a shift in the normal storyline of the narrative people create. With this concept in mind, it might be possible to support the claim that reliving traumatic events, regaining control over one's life narrative, and creating new stories in the VR aids the treatment process in the search for meaning and resolution in life events. Considering the findings of researchers who argue in the field of self-narrative and traumatic treatment, as well as researchers on virtual selves, virtual spaces and VR, this study discusses the virtual as a possible medium to experience narratives and utilize those narratives as better explanatory stories to facilitate the therapeutic process of recovery and self-recreation. This study supports the idea that VR can be used to visualize patients' narratives and help them perceive themselves as active authors of their life's story by retelling traumatic episodes with additional explanation. This experience in the VR is utilized to form healthier narratives and coping techniques for robust therapeutic results that are transferred to real life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.