Selection of essential medicines for South Africa - an analysis of in-depth interviews with national essential medicines list committee members

Abstract

BackgroundThe South African (SA) public health system has employed an Essential Medicines List (EML) with Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) in the public sector since 1996. To date no studies have reported on the process of selection of essential medicines for SA EMLs and how this may have changed over time. This study reports on the decision making process for the selection of essential medicines for SA EMLs, over the years, as described by various members of the National Essential Medicines List Committee (NEMLC) and their task teams.MethodsQualitative in-depth interviews, guided by an interview questionnaire, were conducted with 11 members of the SA NEMLC and their task teams (both past and present members) during the period January – April 2015. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were then coded by the first author and verified by the second author before being reconciled and input into NVIVO, a qualitative software, to facilitate analysis of the data.ResultsThe interviews conducted suggest that the NEMLC process of medicine selection has been refined over the years. This together with the EML review process is now essentially predominantly an evidence based process where quality, safety and efficacy of a medicine is considered first followed by cost considerations which includes pharmacoeconomic evaluations, and pricing of medicines.ConclusionsThis is the first study in SA to report on how decisions are taken to include or exclude medicines on SA national EMLs and provides insight into the SA EML medicine selection, review and monitoring processes over time. The results show that the NEMLC has undergone tremendous transformation over the years. Whilst the membership of the committee largely remains unchanged, the committee has developed its policies and processes over the years. However there is still a need to strengthen the monitoring and evaluation aspects of the SA EML policy process.

Medicine shortages and challenges with the procurement process among public sector hospitals in South Africa; findings and implications

“…Continuous discussions took place between the two authors until a consensus was reached regarding the coding framework. A thematic analysis approach was used based on the hermeneutic theory where data were coded into ranks after a process of classifying codes and re-classifying sub-codes to ensure that exclusionary themes emerged [40,41].…”

“…The sample size of pharmacy managers used as participants in the study was small and limited only to one of the nine provinces in South Africa. Because of the qualitative nature of this study, which involved a small sample size the aim is not to formulate a generalized hypothesis, but to extract the essence of the experience [40]. Consequently the findings of the study may not be generalized to all public sector hospitals in South Africa.…”

Addressing the challenges of implementing a Health Technology Assessment Policy Framework in South Africa

“…In South Africa, there is no structured and formal utilization of HTA (10). However, some decision-making bodies (e.g., private insurance companies, National Essential Medicines List Committee (11), public entity (12)) use HTA-like methods and tools (e.g., domains such as safety and efficacy). It should be recalled that South Africa is a democracy with a three-tier system of government and an independent judiciary.…”

Parents’ and guardians’ perceptions on availability and pricing of medicines and healthcare for children in eThekwini, South Africa – a qualitative study

“…This is not currently considered in the SA Essential Medicines List decision making process and was a recommendation to the SA National essential medicines list committee by Perumal-Pillay and Suleman in their study investigating the selection of essential medicines in SA [30]. …”