1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15269.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of distinct conformational states of the 5‐HT3 receptor by full and partial agonists

Abstract: 2 The concentration-dependent activation and desensitization of the ion currents evoked by the agonists yield the potency order: mCPBG > 5-HTQ % 5-HT > > tryptamine > dopamine, and the efficacy order: 5-HT mCPBG 5-HTQ> > dopamine tryptamine. Thus, 5-HT, 5-HTQ and mCPBG are full agonists, whereas dopamine and tryptamine are partial agonists at the 5-HT3 receptor. 3 Full and partial agonists cause complete cross-desensitization and activate single channels with similar conductances and open lifetimes. This shows… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
29
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of DA-induced desensitization, DA dissociates from desensitized receptors nearly two orders of magnitude faster than 5-HT, and the rate-limiting step leading to recovery is the D 3 R transition. Because of its more rapid dissociation rate, DA has a lower affinity for the desensitized (and open) state than 5-HT, consistent with previous studies showing that DA has a higher IC 50 than 5-HT for inducing 5-HT 3 receptor desensitization (van Hooft and Vijverberg, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the case of DA-induced desensitization, DA dissociates from desensitized receptors nearly two orders of magnitude faster than 5-HT, and the rate-limiting step leading to recovery is the D 3 R transition. Because of its more rapid dissociation rate, DA has a lower affinity for the desensitized (and open) state than 5-HT, consistent with previous studies showing that DA has a higher IC 50 than 5-HT for inducing 5-HT 3 receptor desensitization (van Hooft and Vijverberg, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Oocytes were continuously superfused with external solution containing 115 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1. , 50 nl of a 50 mM BAPTA [bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N, N,NЈ,NЈ-tetraacetic acid] solution was injected into oocytes during the experiments via a third micropipette by using a Drummond microinjector. All agonists used were applied at near maximum-effective concentrations (5,12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this difference is specific for these two PAMs or constitutes a fundamental type I versus II distinction remains to be elucidated. It should also be noted that the process of ␣7 current recovery from desensitization is complex and involves dissociation of ligand from multiple sites and conformational state transitions (Palma et al, 1996;van Hooft and Vijverberg, 1996). Any given PAM may, hence, affect the on and off rates of the agonist, in addition to its onand off-rate kinetics and the conformational transitions in the basal-open-desensitized triad, including reversal of desensitized receptors favoring the open active state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%