2018
DOI: 10.1080/09064710.2018.1520290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of cowpea genotypes based on grain mineral and total protein content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the distribution of micronutrients in cowpea seed also differed markedly among the genotypes studied, with a range of 45.1 to 67.0 µg.g −1 for Fe, 33.9 to 69.2 µg.g −1 for Zn, 10.1 to 17.4 µg.g −1 for Mn, 14.7 to 21.4 µg.g −1 for B, and 5.2 to 8.1 µg.g −1 for Cu ( Table 2). The strong variation in cowpea micronutrient distribution found in this study is consistent with a report by Gerrano et al (2019). Furthermore, we found that the cowpea genotypes with higher micronutrient accumulation, recorded much greater concentrations in leaves than seed.…”
Section: Trace Element Density In Cowpea Leaves and Seedssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the distribution of micronutrients in cowpea seed also differed markedly among the genotypes studied, with a range of 45.1 to 67.0 µg.g −1 for Fe, 33.9 to 69.2 µg.g −1 for Zn, 10.1 to 17.4 µg.g −1 for Mn, 14.7 to 21.4 µg.g −1 for B, and 5.2 to 8.1 µg.g −1 for Cu ( Table 2). The strong variation in cowpea micronutrient distribution found in this study is consistent with a report by Gerrano et al (2019). Furthermore, we found that the cowpea genotypes with higher micronutrient accumulation, recorded much greater concentrations in leaves than seed.…”
Section: Trace Element Density In Cowpea Leaves and Seedssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The observed anomaly in the relationship between percent N derived from fixation and leaf protein concentration in cowpea genotypes appears to depend on the traffic and pathways of symbiotic N transported to leaves from N 2 -fixing bacteroids in root nodules, and the subsequent incorporation of fixed-N into protein. The variation in seed protein found among the cowpea genotypes tested in this study is consistent with a recent report by Gerrano et al (2019).…”
Section: Leaf and Seed Protein Of Cowpea Genotypessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, there are positive relations among Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu, and a positive correlation is found between Mn and Ca. Cowpea genotypes were dried with the microwave by Gerrano et al (). They determined that Cu, Fe, and Mg were also elevated with increased K. In their study, they also found positive correlations between Mg and Mn as well as between P and Na or Zn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is because the N content, that is, the protein constituents, is found in the fruit flesh and seed rather than in the peel (Norfezah, Hardacre, & Brennan, 2011). Gerrano et al (2018) stated that Ca has an essential role in protein synthesis and thus N, which is an essential building element of the protein, also increases with the increase of Ca. Due to the similar chemical properties, the increase in P also showed an increase in Zn (Walker, Miller, & Hassett, 1977).…”
Section: Nutrients Of Apple Peelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results in this current study revealed that water-stress did not have any significant effect on the concentration of the following mineral elements; calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), sodium (Na), phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), Chromium (Cr), and Selenium (Se). However, (Gerrano et al, 2018) in a similar study reported that differential irrigation treatments significantly affected concentrations of Nitrogen, Calcium, Magnesium, Copper, Bromine, and Iron in the field grown cowpea seeds and under field conditions. These differences may be due to genotypic differences in cowpea, environmental condition, and or laboratory procedures/protocols used for the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%