2003
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2002-10342-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of cold transfer and enhanced neutron-pair transfer in the 206 Pb + 118 Sn reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [65] and references therein). In very recently measured systems one successfully demonstrated the powerful method of using PRISMA for such studies, exploiting its unique performance in terms of both resolution and efficiency.…”
Section: Reactions At Sub-barrier Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [65] and references therein). In very recently measured systems one successfully demonstrated the powerful method of using PRISMA for such studies, exploiting its unique performance in terms of both resolution and efficiency.…”
Section: Reactions At Sub-barrier Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a simplif ed way to phenomenologically describe the trend of cross sections is useful to combine in a single plot values extracted via angular distributions or excitation functions and has been frequently used to compare single and multiple transfers of nucleons [19][20][21]. This representation is signif cant only if semiclassical conditions are fullf lled and one deals with (almost) pure Coulomb trajectories.…”
Section: Transfer Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions, reaction products are excited in a limited energy region (few MeV) and therefore the complexity of coupled channel calculations diminishes, since few populated excited states have to be taken into account, and more quantitative information may be extracted on particle correlations [2]. In most of the previous works transfer probabilities P tr have been derived from angular distributions at energies above the Coulomb barrier, where processes other than the direct one may contribute to the cross section, causing slope anomalies [3][4][5][6]. Excitation functions at energies below the barrier have been performed in only a few cases [7][8][9][10], due to experimental difficulties and to limitation in detection efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%