2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2011.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of coals of different maturities for CO2 Storage by modelling of CH4 and CO2 adsorption isotherms

Abstract: International audienceCO2 injection in unmineable coal seams could be one interesting option for both storage and methane recovery processes. The objective of this study is to compare and model pure gas sorption isotherms (CO2 and CH4) for well-characterised coals of different maturities to determine the most suitable coal for CO2 storage. Carbon dioxide and methane adsorption on several coals have been investigated using a gravimetric adsorption method. The experiments were carried out using both CO2 and CH4 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adsorbed CO 2 quantities are lower than those observed for coal samples. At 298 K and 5 MPa, the adsorbed CO 2 quantity onto shale is about 0.3 mmol/g, where as it is between 0.45 to 2.0 mmol/g onto raw coal, depending the coal sample [3]. The results are not the same for the 2 shale samples, which is not surprising because the samples do not have the same mineral composition.…”
Section: Results: Co 2 Adsorption Isothermscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Adsorbed CO 2 quantities are lower than those observed for coal samples. At 298 K and 5 MPa, the adsorbed CO 2 quantity onto shale is about 0.3 mmol/g, where as it is between 0.45 to 2.0 mmol/g onto raw coal, depending the coal sample [3]. The results are not the same for the 2 shale samples, which is not surprising because the samples do not have the same mineral composition.…”
Section: Results: Co 2 Adsorption Isothermscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…1 One important reason is that pores in shales are composed of different pore types, such as clay, organic, and carbonate pores. 13,46 Clay and organic pores are usually considered the major contributors to the nanoscale pores in shale and consequently control methane adsorption capacity. 19,[47][48][49] Considering the significant differences between organic and clay pores, it is necessary to discuss the fractal characteristics of each.…”
Section: Fractal Characteristics Of Different Pore Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the most common adsorption models, the Langmuir (Garnier et al, 2011) and Sips (Foo et al, 2010) isotherms, were used to correlate the experimental data of CO 2 and CH 4 adsorption on MWCNT and N-MWCNT at 298 K. The values of model parameters are given in Table 3. The Langmuir isotherm corresponds to homogeneous adsorbent surfaces (Purna Chandra Rao et al, 2006).…”
Section: Adsorption Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%