2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of best impregnated palm shell activated carbon (PSAC) for simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…350 m 2 g -1 , and tend to decrease along with dolomite loading in the raw mixtures. Such a trend is known to be resultant from a pore-blocking effect, frequently observed in chemically modified activated carbons or impregnated ones [26]. In the case of PET/DOL-based samples, the regular lowering in pore structure parameters must be caused by increasing contents of CaO and MgO crystallites incorporated into the carbon matrix.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…350 m 2 g -1 , and tend to decrease along with dolomite loading in the raw mixtures. Such a trend is known to be resultant from a pore-blocking effect, frequently observed in chemically modified activated carbons or impregnated ones [26]. In the case of PET/DOL-based samples, the regular lowering in pore structure parameters must be caused by increasing contents of CaO and MgO crystallites incorporated into the carbon matrix.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 3 shows the RBBR removal percentage versus the time interval obtained from Eq. (2). It can be seen that the RBBR removal percentage increases with time and reaches a constant value above 20 hours.…”
Section: Proximate Analysismentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Activated carbon has been proven to be an effective and widely used adsorbent for the removal of a variety of organic and inorganic pollutants dissolved in aqueous solution [1], or from a gaseous environment [2] Activated carbons used as adsorbent have a comparatively high surface area and total pore volume. The commercially available activated carbons made from petroleum coke, bituminous coal, and lignite are expensive, which limits their use and application [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tian et al (2009) demonstrated that the doped CeO 2 in activated carbon significantly promoted the adsorption ability for Hg 0 . Sumathi et al (2010) indicated that the raw and the palm shell-based activated carbons impregnated with Ni, V, Fe and Ce metal oxides can be used to simultaneous removal of SO 2 and NO x . Liu and Liu (2013) suggested that activated coke doped with V metal oxide had high activities in adsorption and oxidation, which are the key mechanisms for multipollutants removal in coal-fired flue gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%