2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of appropriate protein assay method for a paper microfluidics platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings confirm the results presented in [ 14 ], which indicated that the tetrabromophenol blue method provides the best analytical parameters for protein determination on paper (the pyrogallol red method was not included in the referenced study). However, the limit of quantification obtained in [ 14 ] for the TBPB assay equal to 2900 mg·L −1 does not allow for urinary protein determination in a clinically relevant range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings confirm the results presented in [ 14 ], which indicated that the tetrabromophenol blue method provides the best analytical parameters for protein determination on paper (the pyrogallol red method was not included in the referenced study). However, the limit of quantification obtained in [ 14 ] for the TBPB assay equal to 2900 mg·L −1 does not allow for urinary protein determination in a clinically relevant range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Surprisingly, neither Bradford nor BCA-Cu(II) assays generated any measurable color change when transferred from conventional spectrophotometry to paper-based sensor. Pokhrel et al [ 14 ] recommended performing the Bradford assay on glass microfiber instead of paper. However, we found this remedy to be insufficient to solve the problem of a lack of color change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations