2017
DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection into Emergency Medicine specialist training: A commentary on the science of selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Situational judgement tests and multiple mini‐interviews have evidence supporting their validity as predictors of non‐academic attributes . These selection tools are further explored in this edition by Chu et al …”
Section: Are All Selection Tools Equal?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Situational judgement tests and multiple mini‐interviews have evidence supporting their validity as predictors of non‐academic attributes . These selection tools are further explored in this edition by Chu et al …”
Section: Are All Selection Tools Equal?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Situational judgement tests and multiple mini-interviews have evidence supporting their validity as predictors of non-academic attributes. 7 These selection tools are further explored in this edition by Chu et al 10 The implementation of a SIFT process represents an opportunity for ACEM to conduct their own research on selection into specialist training. This year, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists is introducing the use of situational judgement tests into their selection process, purely for the purpose of data collection.…”
Section: Are All Selection Tools Equal?mentioning
confidence: 99%