1982
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1982.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection in plant populations of effectively infinite size: III. The maintenance of females among hermaphrodites for a biallelic model

Abstract: SUMMARYAn allele or genotype is called protected if for all initial genotype frequencies positive it cannot be lost or does not remain at very low frequencies indefinitely. An analysis of protectedness was made for gynodioecious populations (populations with both female and hermaphrodite individuals) with four different types of one-locus two-allele models for the inheritance of gynodioecy. Ovule and pollen fertilities, together with selfing rates may differ between hermaphrodite genotypes. Such factors have n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most favourable conditions under which male sterility gene(s) allow the evolution of gynodioecism are likely to be those where a high level of self-fertilisation occurs and there is marked inbreeding depression, and female plants have an increased ovule production (Charlesworth & Charlesworth 1978a). Gregorius et al (1982) emphasise the selfing in hermaphrodites but not the inbreeding depression described by the Charlesworths.…”
Section: Gynodioecismmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most favourable conditions under which male sterility gene(s) allow the evolution of gynodioecism are likely to be those where a high level of self-fertilisation occurs and there is marked inbreeding depression, and female plants have an increased ovule production (Charlesworth & Charlesworth 1978a). Gregorius et al (1982) emphasise the selfing in hermaphrodites but not the inbreeding depression described by the Charlesworths.…”
Section: Gynodioecismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The evolution of gynodioecism has attracted considerable attentIon since the initial reports of Darwin (1877) and the important paper of Lewis (1941); recent papers include Charlesworth & Charlesworth (1978a, 1978b, Ross (1978Ross ( , 1982, Charlesworth & Ganders (1979), Webb (1979), Lloyd (1980Lloyd ( , 1982, Charlesworth (1981), Gregorius et al (1982Gregorius et al ( , 1983) among others.…”
Section: Gynodioecismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two locus models with various types of gene interaction have been studied by Ross and Shaw (1971). Their conclusion, that male sterility can be maintained by fitness differences between sex phenotypes, irrespective of the number of nuclear genes involved or their mode of interaction, has later been generalised (Lloyd, 1975;Charlesworth, 1981; but see Gregorius et a!., 1982). The mode of genetic control, however, is of importance when overdominance is involved in the inheritance of male sterility (Ross, e.g., 1978).…”
Section: A Third Male Sterility Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolutionary forces that can account for these different types have been thoroughly studied (Charlesworth & Charlesworth, 1978a, b;Charesworth & Ganders, 1979;Gregorius et al, 1982Gregorius et al, , 1983: for fungi, however, such studies appear to be lacking. This paper is a theoretical analysis of the evolutionary relations between a number of fungal reproductive strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%