2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection in migration and return migration: Evidence from micro data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results therefore highlight the well-known fact that migrants, and particularly return migrants, constitute a highly selected group of the population of the source country (Ramos, 1992;Borjas and Bratsberg, 1996;Rooth and Saarela, 2007). Explicit analyses of selection processes, which have been beyond the scope of this paper, are essential for a more detailed understanding of the labour market situation of return migrants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results therefore highlight the well-known fact that migrants, and particularly return migrants, constitute a highly selected group of the population of the source country (Ramos, 1992;Borjas and Bratsberg, 1996;Rooth and Saarela, 2007). Explicit analyses of selection processes, which have been beyond the scope of this paper, are essential for a more detailed understanding of the labour market situation of return migrants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migration rates from Finland, and return migration rates from Sweden, have been found higher among non-employed than among employed persons (Finnäs, 2003;Saarela and Finnäs, 2006). This may partly be due to inadequate skills, as Finnish migrants in general have relatively low educational levels (Finnäs, 2003;Rooth and Saarela, 2007). A central issue here is therefore whether any employment difficulties of return migrants interrelate with structural confounders, such as education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in Sweden, young immigrants with university degrees and high (adjusted mean) income have higher propensities to return (Nekby 2006). Finnish returnees from Sweden, as a particular group, are positively selected on education (Rooth and Saarela 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent studies that have used the same data (Saarela and Finnäs 2006b;Rooth and Saarela 2007), there is no clear evidence in support of the view that variation in economic outcomes between the two groups would be an artifact of differences in selective migration. Swedish speakers have higher immigration rates and lower return migration rates (Finnäs 1986(Finnäs , 2003), so there is a level difference, but the selection on observable and unobservable characteristics appears to be fairly similar.…”
Section: Settings For Analysis and Theoretical Underpinningsmentioning
confidence: 87%