2019
DOI: 10.1111/medu.14023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection in context: The importance of clarity, transparency and evidence in achieving widening participation goals

Abstract: The authors use the example of ‘contextual admissions’ in the UK to demonstrate the importance of clarity, transparency and evidence for overcoming myths that surround fair and equitable selection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What was unclear at the time of the interviews was whether these concerns about repercussions were simply anxieties triggered by, perhaps, the lack of transparency in medical education selection (Rees & Woolf, 2020), versus fears grounded in reality and trainee experience. Fears over repercussions in medical education are certainly well-documented in the literature (Binder et al, 2018), especially "covert" retaliation a trainee might never be directly aware of due to lack of transparency/perceived subjectivity in many medical advancement processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What was unclear at the time of the interviews was whether these concerns about repercussions were simply anxieties triggered by, perhaps, the lack of transparency in medical education selection (Rees & Woolf, 2020), versus fears grounded in reality and trainee experience. Fears over repercussions in medical education are certainly well-documented in the literature (Binder et al, 2018), especially "covert" retaliation a trainee might never be directly aware of due to lack of transparency/perceived subjectivity in many medical advancement processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have defined ‘Non-traditional background’ as applicants who attended state-funded secondary schools, who were First in Family to attend higher education, and who were from areas of low higher education participation and/or areas of high deprivation. These factors were chosen as they are criteria frequently used to confer eligibility for contextual admissions to medical schools in the UK [ 1 , 18 ]. Participants were categorised on an ordinal scale from non-traditional to traditional depending on how many traditional attributes they possessed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widening participation in medicine has become a priority in many countries over recent years. The aims of widening participation are to ensure the full talent pool of applicants is utilised, produce a diverse and representative workforce, improve social mobility, redress inequalities, promote social mobility, and ensure social justice[ 1 ]. The specific goals of widening participation vary by national context, depending on which groups experience inequality of access [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Educational research points to the influence of many external factors on student academic performance, such as quality of teachers and/or schools, parental background, and socioeconomic status (SES) (Perry & McConney, 2010; Thomson, 2018). One of the outcomes of such research is a growing interest in and commitment to the notion of “widening participation” in tertiary education, with a focus on how applicants from underrepresented and/or minoritized groups can be better supported in the selection process (Cleland et al, 2018; Fyfe et al, 2022; Rees & Woolf, 2020; Younger et al, 2019). The argument that a broader basis for selection, including assessment of reasoning ability beyond school‐based academic performance, should enable a more diverse range of applicants to compete for tertiary places is one of the main justifications for the use of cognitive ability tests in the medical school selection process (Kelly et al, 2018; McDonald et al, 2000; Nicholson, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%