Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus

Abstract

BackgroundCoding sequence (CDS) length, gene size, and intron length vary within a genome and among genomes. Previous studies in diverse organisms, including human, D. Melanogaster, C. elegans, S. cerevisiae, and Arabidopsis thaliana, indicated that there are negative relationships between expression level and gene size, CDS length as well as intron length. Different models such as selection for economy model, genomic design model, and mutational bias hypotheses have been proposed to explain such observation. The debate of which model is a superior one to explain the observation has not been settled down. The chicken (Gallus gallus) is an important model organism that bridges the evolutionary gap between mammals and other vertebrates. As D. Melanogaster, chicken has a larger effective population size, selection for chicken genome is expected to be more effective in increasing protein synthesis efficiency. Therefore, in this study the chicken was used as a model organism to elucidate the interaction between gene features and expression pattern upon selection pressure.ResultsBased on different technologies, we gathered expression data for nuclear protein coding, single-splicing genes from Gallus gallus genome and compared them with gene parameters. We found that gene size, CDS length, first intron length, average intron length, and total intron length are negatively correlated with expression level and expression breadth significantly. The tissue specificity is positively correlated with the first intron length but negatively correlated with the average intron length, and not correlated with the CDS length and protein domain numbers. Comparison analyses showed that ubiquitously expressed genes and narrowly expressed genes with the similar expression levels do not differ in compactness. Our data provided evidence that the genomic design model can not, at least in part, explain our observations. We grouped all somatic-tissue-specific genes (n = 1105), and compared the first intron length and the average intron length between highly expressed genes (top 5% expressed genes) and weakly expressed genes (bottom 5% expressed genes). We found that the first intron length and the average intron length in highly expressed genes are not different from that in weakly expressed genes. We also made a comparison between ubiquitously expressed genes and narrowly expressed somatic genes with similar expression levels. Our data demonstrated that ubiquitously expressed genes are less compact than narrowly expressed genes with the similar expression levels. Obviously, these observations can not be explained by mutational bias hypotheses either. We also found that the significant trend between genes' compactness and expression level could not be affected by local mutational biases. We argued that the selection of economy model is most likely one to explain the relationship between gene expression and gene characteristics in chicken genome.ConclusionNatural selection appears to favor the compactness of highly expressed genes in chicken g...

Genomic Organization of Purinergic P2X Receptors

“…This suggests that P2X 2 went over a shortening of introns that could have conferred a regulatory function in a similar way to some constitutive genes [22] [24]. All the intron phases are conserved in P2X 2 orthologous, suggesting that no major genomic re-arrangements have occurred.…”

“…Previous works showed shorter introns in constitutive genes compared to those of low expression [22] [23]. This is explained by the naturally selected gene compression since transcription and mRNA processing are slow and energetically costly processes [22] [24]. The small intron size of P2X2 correlates with its high prevalence in cells responsive to purinergic signaling like neurons of the peripheral nervous system [25].…”

Translational signatures and mRNA levels are highly correlated in human stably expressed genes

“…In both datasets tAi produced higher correlation scores and lower p values than CAI. While CAI and some other indexes that estimate the role of codon bias in translational efficiency are based on the frequency of synonymous optimal codons found in highly expressed genes [27], tAi considers the tRNA pool within the cell, in which each codon is assigned a value that corresponds to the disponibility of the corresponding tRNAs [7]. tAi is, therefore, a more direct measure of biological function than CAI and other indexes based on codon frequency.…”

Physicochemical Foundations of Life that Direct Evolution: Chance and Natural Selection are not Evolutionary Driving Forces

“…Indeed, the mechanical properties of GC-rich DNA regions favors transcription efficiency (but not elongation speed) and avoids nascent RNAs from interacting with the DNA template due to the formation of stable secondary structures in the nascent GC-rich RNAs [69,70]. High GC-rich content can also increase the local rate of recombination and deletion, leading eukaryotic GC-rich genes to bear smaller introns (as compared with AT-rich genes) [29,30,112,120]. Of note, small GC-rich introns are more efficiently spliced, likely because of intronic RNA secondary structures [79,121].…”