2017
DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2017.1373493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection for special education services: the role of gender and socio-economic status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the log odds of exposure as propensity score. The following 10 variables served as potential confounders based on prior evidence of their importance (Kvande, Belsky, and Wichstrøm 2017;Hibel, Farkas, and Morgan 2010;Mann, McCartney, and Park 2007): child's gender, symptoms of ADHD, ODD/CD, test scores in reading and math, intelligence, ability to learn; parental socio-economic status and educational level; and teacher's sense of helplessness when teaching the child. In the propensity score modelling, missing values were handled by multiple imputation (MI), with 100 imputed data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the log odds of exposure as propensity score. The following 10 variables served as potential confounders based on prior evidence of their importance (Kvande, Belsky, and Wichstrøm 2017;Hibel, Farkas, and Morgan 2010;Mann, McCartney, and Park 2007): child's gender, symptoms of ADHD, ODD/CD, test scores in reading and math, intelligence, ability to learn; parental socio-economic status and educational level; and teacher's sense of helplessness when teaching the child. In the propensity score modelling, missing values were handled by multiple imputation (MI), with 100 imputed data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores from the numeracy test ranged from 0 to 50 in first grade, and 0 to 85 in third grade. Based on a priori knowledge of important confounders of selection into SE (Kvande, Belsky, and Wichstrøm 2017;Hibel, Farkas, and Morgan 2010;Mann, McCartney, and Park 2007), we assessed the teacher's level of helplessness by asking the child's primary teacher in first and third grades to respond to the following question, with the answer coded on a five-point scale ranging from (1) 'not at all' to (5) 'very strongly': 'When you teach this student, to what degree do you feel helpless?'. To assess the students' ability to learn, the primary teacher were asked the following, 'Compared to other students of same age, how much is he/she learning?'…”
Section: Potential Confoundersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, students' SES and service delivery models could affect teachers' teaching experience and burnout levels. Kvande et al (2018) identified the mediated effects of students' SES status on special education services. Specifically, students with low SES were more likely to receive special education services, and teachers reported increased feelings of helplessness when these students demonstrated low academic achievement.…”
Section: Student-related Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the possibilities for the development of the approach are related to the characteristics of the contexts, from an institutional perspective the Inclusion Index (Booth, Ainscow,Black-Hawkins, Vaughan and Shaw, 2000), being highly welcomed, but in the face of weakness in teacher training for the scope of inclusive practices is not identified a specific response, nor measurement of impact of training processes or intervention to curricula of the bachelor's degrees of the professions involved with the educational communities, and even impact on students who develop their studies in centers that apply the inclusive approach (Kvande, Belsky and Wichstrom, 2018;García Molina and Sáez Carreras, 2017;Usarralde, Català and Rico, 2017). Against the foregoing, societies continue to be awaiting the application of inclusive education that encourages the participation and acceptance of differences (Beers and Summers, 2018;Caro, Cárdenas-Rodríguez and Casado).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%