1979
DOI: 10.2527/jas1979.483509x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection for Ovulation Rate in Swine: Correlated Response in Litter Size and Weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
43
2
4

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
10
43
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In rabbits selected for OR, the genetic correlation between OR and LS was estimated with low precision, as in the experiments of selection for OR in other polytocous species [see Cunningham et al (1979) and Rosendo et al (2007) for pigs and Bradford (1969) and Land and Falconer (1969) for mice]. Therefore, conclusions about its value should be taken with caution.…”
Section: Litter Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In rabbits selected for OR, the genetic correlation between OR and LS was estimated with low precision, as in the experiments of selection for OR in other polytocous species [see Cunningham et al (1979) and Rosendo et al (2007) for pigs and Bradford (1969) and Land and Falconer (1969) for mice]. Therefore, conclusions about its value should be taken with caution.…”
Section: Litter Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection for ovulation rate has been unsuccessful as a means of indirectly improving litter size in pigs (Cunningham et al, 1979;Rosendo et al, 2007;Leymaster and Christenson, 2000) and mice (Land and Falconer, 1969;Bradford, 1969), despite the increase in ovulation rate. The lack of correlated response in litter size has been associated with an increase in the postimplantation mortality [see Bradford (1969) for mice and Freking et al (2007) for pigs].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter size at birth is the main contributor to variation in sow reproductive efficiency (Tess et al, 1983), but is poorly heritable and consequently rather difficult to improve through selection (Bolet et al, 1989 (Cunningham et al, 1979). Subsequent selection for litter size produced a significant increase in litter size (Lamberson et al, 1991 (Tess et al, 1983;Rydhmer, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection for ovulation rate in pigs has changed ovulation rate substantially, but not litter size (Cunningham et al, 1979;Johnson and Neal, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous experiment with mice (Islam et (Cunningham et al, 1979;Johnson and Neal, 1988 (Land et al, 1980;Haley et al, 1989). Other workers have found some evidence of a correlation between testis size and litter size or ovulation rate in sheep (Ricordeau et al, 1979(Ricordeau et al, , 1986Purvis et al, 1988), cattle (Toelle and Robison, 1985a) and pigs (Schinckel et al, 1983;Toelle and Robison, 1985b;see Haley et al (1989) for review).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%