Selection and use of general-purpose programming languages

Cuginin, J

doi:10.6028/nbs.sp.500-117v1

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

A Framework For Evaluation1

Scope1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1987

1989

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Other2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…8 Cugini has built a database of programs for a fixed, non-trivial problem, but the data have not been studied in any depth. 9 In each of these cases, a fixed problem was used to evaluate some properties of the process or the product. Halstead, on the other hand, introduced Software Science as a theory for repeatable and universal measures at the problem level.…”

Section: A Framework For Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation Methodology for Software Engineering

Blum¹

1989

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: A Framework For Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Clinical Information Systems: Now and in the Future, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia, Sept. 7, 1988. Issues in Clinical Information Systems (Keynote Address), Seminar on Medical Informatics and Information Management Systems, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, Sept. 9…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation Methodology for Software Engineering

Blum¹

1989

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…• A comparison of symbolic languages per se vs. conventional languages [Cugi84] Readers interested in these topics may find useful material in the Bibliography.…”

Section: Scopementioning

confidence: 99%

Programming languages for knowledge-based systems

Cuginia¹

1987

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge-Based Systems (KBS) represent a new software methodology which can broaden the scope of computer applications. When developing such software at the programming level, symbolic languages offer features to the programmer not provided by traditional procedural languages. The three most widespread symbolic languages are Lisp, Prolog, and 0PS5. An abstract model for a basic KBS and associated terminology is described. This provides a framework for evaluation of the languages. There are several criteria by which one may assess the relative merits of these languages for a given knowledge-based application. Some are related to the languages' expressiveness for typical KBS techniques, others to the user's requirements. An extensive set of these criteria is discussed, and the languages are evaluated in light of them. While Lisp offers more features for general-purpose and symbolic computing, it does not offer direct support for the derivation process. 0PS5 and Prolog have features especially designed for KBS, but lack many common general-purpose constructs.

show abstract

The comparison and selection of programming languages for high energy physics applications

White

1989

Computer Physics Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Selection and use of general-purpose programming languages

Cited by 6 publications

References 1 publication

Evaluation Methodology for Software Engineering

Evaluation Methodology for Software Engineering

Programming languages for knowledge-based systems

The comparison and selection of programming languages for high energy physics applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About