1996
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v87.12.5297.bloodjournal87125297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selectins mediate eosinophil recruitment in vivo: a comparison with their role in neutrophil influx

Abstract: The role of selectins in mediating eosinophil recruitment in vivo was assessed in a model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced mouse pleurisy. LPS administration resulted in significant eosinophil influx at 24 hours, whereas neutrophil recruitment to the cavity peaked at 4 hours and persisted for 24 hours. The anti-L-selectin monoclonal antibody (MoAb) MEL-14 effectively inhibited (by 97%) eosinophil influx at 24 hours and also inhibited neutrophil recruitment at both times (75% to 95%). Eosinophil recruitment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results mirror the findings reported in arthritic rats in which integrin blockade was not used and where Eselectin was found to play a statistically significant role only in concert with P-selectin [14]. Our findings are consistent with the findings of others employing E-and Pselectin blockade or E-and P-selectin double-deficient mice, indicating that these selectins in combination are more efficient for neutrophil recruitment to inflamed tissues than either alone [14,15,19,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results mirror the findings reported in arthritic rats in which integrin blockade was not used and where Eselectin was found to play a statistically significant role only in concert with P-selectin [14]. Our findings are consistent with the findings of others employing E-and Pselectin blockade or E-and P-selectin double-deficient mice, indicating that these selectins in combination are more efficient for neutrophil recruitment to inflamed tissues than either alone [14,15,19,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Also surprising was the finding that P‐selectin played no role in eosinophil recruitment, because numerous studies have demonstrated reduced rolling, adhesion, and/or recruitment of eosinophils in mice lacking P‐selectin or in animals treated with selectin‐blocking antibodies 25–29. In fact, it has been suggested that P‐selectin antagonists may be effective in inhibiting eosinophil accumulation at sites of allergic inflammation 30–33. Nonetheless, the current study clearly demonstrated that the blocking of P‐selectin/PSGL‐1 interactions alone may be insufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Our previous work showed that LPS-induced neutrophil accumulation in the mouse pleural cavity was dependent on all three selectins, although inhibition of either endothelial selectin alone was not inhibitory (Henriques et al, 1996). LPS induces expression of P-and E-selectin in vivo (Gotsch et al, 1994) and therefore the requirement for these molecules in mediating neutrophil migration was not unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%