2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the optimum pressure drop per unit length of district heating piping network based on operating strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced pressure drop allows for smaller pipe dimensions to be used, which in turn may reduce the building costs of the DH system. A decrease of the pressure drop will also mean that less pump work is needed in the systems [1,23].…”
Section: Performance Of the Customer Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced pressure drop allows for smaller pipe dimensions to be used, which in turn may reduce the building costs of the DH system. A decrease of the pressure drop will also mean that less pump work is needed in the systems [1,23].…”
Section: Performance Of the Customer Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pengfei et al [8] investigated the pressure drops per unit length that are currently recommended in the design of DH networks (30-70 Pa/m in China and 100 Pa/m in most of European countries). A tree-shaped DH network in the Hebei province (China) was used as a case study, considering the demand for five outdoor temperatures combined with four operating strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancona et al [22] introduced a technical-economical optimization procedure for DH network design in order to minimize the pumping energy consumption and thermal energy losses as well as to maximize the annual revenue. Likewise, Jie et al [23] optimized a tree-shaped DH network in Hebei Province, China, by taking into account the heat demands at five different outdoor temperatures and with different operating strategies. The objective was to minimize the sum of the annualized costs, including the heat distribution cost relating to pumping and heat losses as well as the pipe investment cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%