2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the most relevant brain regions to discriminate Alzheimer's disease patients from healthy controls using multiple kernel learning: A comparison across functional and structural imaging modalities and atlases

Abstract: BackgroundMachine learning techniques such as support vector machine (SVM) have been applied recently in order to accurately classify individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on neuroimaging data. However, the multivariate nature of the SVM approach often precludes the identification of the brain regions that contribute most to classification accuracy. Multiple kernel learning (MKL) is a sparse machine learning method that allows the identification of the most relevant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pallidum region was found to have a significant difference in beta-amyloid burden between early and late-onset AD (Youn et al, 2017) and differences in RNA binding protein TDP-43 deposits (Josephs et al, 2016). Finally, researchers using different imaging modalities to discriminate AD patients found the pallidum and putamen to be consistently important (Rondina et al, 2018). Various frontal regions were relevant for the model decision; this might represent an advanced disease stage in the selected population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pallidum region was found to have a significant difference in beta-amyloid burden between early and late-onset AD (Youn et al, 2017) and differences in RNA binding protein TDP-43 deposits (Josephs et al, 2016). Finally, researchers using different imaging modalities to discriminate AD patients found the pallidum and putamen to be consistently important (Rondina et al, 2018). Various frontal regions were relevant for the model decision; this might represent an advanced disease stage in the selected population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two CSF analytes (tau and neurofilament light) had non-normal distributions and were log-transformed prior to analysis. For MR gray matter volume values, a meta-ROI shown to discriminate between AD and controls was constructed as the average of the following regions: inferior temporal gyrus, caudate, paracentral lobule, superior temporal pole, posterior cingulate, amygdala, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, angular gyrus, and mid-temporal pole (Rondina et al, 2018). Main effects of diet, cognitive group, and the interaction of diet by cognitive group on PCASL perfusion were examined utilizing a voxel-wise multiple regression in SPM12.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Zhang et al (2011) conducted a classification based on MRI, PET, and CSF biomarkers. Moreover, other imaging modalities or PET tracers can be considered, as Rondina et al (2018) used T1-MRI, 18 F-FDG-PET and rCBF-SPECT as the imaging modalities while Wang et al (2016) used 18 F-FDG and 18 F-florbetapir as tracers of PET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%