2005
DOI: 10.1080/10485250500054642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the amount of smoothing in nonparametric regression estimation for complex surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] Simulation done L = 500 times for each setting. Each time, we generate a population based on one of the four supermodels, then draw a sample using either SRS or Poisson sampling.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8] Simulation done L = 500 times for each setting. Each time, we generate a population based on one of the four supermodels, then draw a sample using either SRS or Poisson sampling.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buskirk and Lohr [6] presented finite-sample and asymptotic properties under several approaches for inference of a modified density estimator introduced by Buskirk [7] and Bellhouse and Stafford. [3] Opsomer and Miller [8] studied the selection of the amount of smoothing for the nonparametric regression component of a model-assisted estimator using a cross-validation criterion. Breidt et al [9] and Goga [10] proposed estimators of the population totals using smoothing splines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bandwidth parameter for the model-based estimator is selected by minimizing the cross-validation function, The nonparametric regression estimators are based on the local polynomial regression estimator with p = 1. To ensure the estimator (2) is well-defined for every sample, we consider the ridge adjustment of Opsomer and Miller (2005), which is similar to Seifert and Gasser (2000) and consisting in the addition of the term ν N p+1 I (we use ν = 1). The resulting estimator is given by m j = e 1 (X s j W s j X s j + ν N p+1 I ) −1 X s j W s j Y s = w s j Y s .…”
Section: Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For selecting the bandwidth parameter h with the model-assisted approach, we consider the design-based cross-validation criterion DC V , which was introduced by Opsomer and Miller (2005) and is given by…”
Section: Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…samples from the underlying population. There are only a few results available when the sampling design is different (e.g., [5,7,13,18,2,3,4] and [20]). The properties of nonparametric kernel density estimation based on i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%