2006
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.044537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting immunohistochemical cut-off scores for novel biomarkers of progression and survival in colorectal cancer

Abstract: Background: Cut-off scores for determining positivity of biomarkers detected by immunohistochemistry are often set arbitrarily and vary between reports. Aims: To evaluate the performance of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in determining clinically important cut-off scores for a novel tumour marker, the receptor for hyaluronic acid mediated motility (RHAMM), and show the reproducibility of the selected cut-off scores in 1197 mismatch-repair (MMR) proficient colorectal cancers (CRC). Metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
200
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
200
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the association of positive protein expression with clinico-pathological features, cutoff scores for CK20, CK7, and CDX2 expression were determined by ROC curve analysis. 37 The ROC curve is a plot of the sensitivity and (1-specificity) for an outcome at each value of the protein expression score. A protein score can therefore be selected from the curve such that a cutoff at this value leads to the greatest number of patients correctly classified as with (maximizing sensitivity) and without (maximizing specificity) the clinical end point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the association of positive protein expression with clinico-pathological features, cutoff scores for CK20, CK7, and CDX2 expression were determined by ROC curve analysis. 37 The ROC curve is a plot of the sensitivity and (1-specificity) for an outcome at each value of the protein expression score. A protein score can therefore be selected from the curve such that a cutoff at this value leads to the greatest number of patients correctly classified as with (maximizing sensitivity) and without (maximizing specificity) the clinical end point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of cut-off scores for protein positivity Relevant cut-off scores for tumour positivity for each protein marker were obtained by performing receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (Zlobec et al, 2006b). Briefly, plots of sensitivity and (1-specificity) for complete pathologic tumour response were obtained for each marker and the (0,1)-criterion was used to select the threshold value, or protein expression score, above which expression was to be considered 'positive' (Bewick et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of immunoreactivity is underlined as a major source of contradictory findings (Goldstein and Armin, 2001;Resnick et al, 2004;Spano et al, 2005;Kim et al, 2006;. In order to avoid the use of predetermined and often arbitrarily set cut-off values, we have previously shown how ROC curve analysis in conjunction with a resampling procedure can be systematically used to evaluate the protein expression of immunohistochemical tumour markers (Zlobec et al, 2007a). Along with a reproducible semi-quantitative scoring system, ROC curve analysis is a powerful method for selecting cutoff scores to describe tumour marker positivity for a specific clinical endpoint, such as tumour response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 This method identifies the point on the ROC curve that corresponds to the protein expression score above which sensitivity for the outcome is maximized while loss of specificity is minimized. 24 Tumors designated as ''negative'' for the protein were those with scores below the threshold value, whereas positive tumors were considered those with scores above the threshold value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%