2003
DOI: 10.1067/s0022-3476(03)00328-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting girls with precocious puberty for brain imaging: validation of European evidence-based diagnosis rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
57
4
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
57
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both sensitivity and specificity perhaps could be improved by combining a high PCT with other VUR predictors in clinical decision rule, as has been proposed in other situations to avoid unnecessary imaging in children. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both sensitivity and specificity perhaps could be improved by combining a high PCT with other VUR predictors in clinical decision rule, as has been proposed in other situations to avoid unnecessary imaging in children. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(vi) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is indicated in all boys with CPP, given the high prevalence of organic causes in this group. Most centres would probably also routinely perform this imaging in all girls with precocious puberty, although the prevalence of an organic lesion is much lower when early puberty presents after 6 years of age (18).…”
Section: Precocious Puberty: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, no se han descrito variables predictoras lo suficientemente seguras como para seleccionar a qué tipo de niñas se les debe realizar. [8][9][10] En nuestro Servicio de Endocrinología Pediátrica, del total de pacientes con PP en 10 años (n= 136), el 13,2% presentan algún hallazgo en la RM (HH en 27,7% de ellos).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified