2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting Breast Cancer Patients for Chemotherapy: The Opening of the UK OPTIMA Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Most prognostic tests provide an estimate of relapse risk following the treatment for ER+ breast cancer, but still lack predictive value for novel targeted treatment options. 2, 4 These multiparametric tests, which include OncotypeDx® (Genomic Health Inc.), 5, 6 Prosigna ™ (NanoString Technologies, Inc.), 79 MammaPrint® (Agendia Inc.), 10, 11 Breast Cancer Index (BioTheranostics Inc.), 12, 13 and EndoPredict (Sividon Diagnostics GmbH), 14 all provide broadly similar clinical utility. 15, 16 Although each is derived from RNA abundance studies, there are surprisingly few overlapping genes between different RNA signatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Most prognostic tests provide an estimate of relapse risk following the treatment for ER+ breast cancer, but still lack predictive value for novel targeted treatment options. 2, 4 These multiparametric tests, which include OncotypeDx® (Genomic Health Inc.), 5, 6 Prosigna ™ (NanoString Technologies, Inc.), 79 MammaPrint® (Agendia Inc.), 10, 11 Breast Cancer Index (BioTheranostics Inc.), 12, 13 and EndoPredict (Sividon Diagnostics GmbH), 14 all provide broadly similar clinical utility. 15, 16 Although each is derived from RNA abundance studies, there are surprisingly few overlapping genes between different RNA signatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While breast oncologists are eagerly awaiting the results from three ongoing randomized clinical trials (Rxponder [36], MINDACT [37], OPTIMA [38]) to address this question, Ki67 IHC is intended to guide clinicians to weigh risk-benefit ratio of adjuvant chemotherapy as this is widely available and financially acceptable in most laboratories. Our study revealed that low Ki67 alone may not provide enough prognostic information for clinicians to abort adjuvant chemotherapy in node negative or node positive (LN=1-3) ES-HPBC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, threshold values for these multiparameter molecular markers are still controversial, there is no specific data on their performance in young women, and the majority of the world has no access to this technology for logistic or financial reasons. Prospective data from the ongoing trials evaluating the performance of gene-expression assays are awaited to reassess the prognosis and benefit of adjuvant treatment according to age and tumor biology in the modern era and to better identify those patients that may be safely spared adjuvant chemotherapy [88][89][90][91].…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%