Selecting and analysing climate change adaptation measures at six research sites across Europe

Abstract

Abstract. As Europe is faced with increasing droughts and extreme precipitation, countries are taking measures to adapt to these changes. It is challenging, however, to navigate through the wide range of possible measures, taking into account the efficacy, economic impact and social justice aspects of these measures, as well as the governance requirements for implementing them. This article presents the approach of selecting and analysing adaptation measures to increasing extreme weather events caused by ongoing climate change that was developed and applied in the H2020 project BINGO (Bringing Innovation to Ongoing Water Management). The purpose of this project is (a) to develop an integrated participatory approach for selecting and evaluating adaptation measures, (b) to apply and evaluate the approach across six case-study river basins across Europe, and (c) to support decision-making towards adaptation capturing the diversity, the different circumstances and challenges river basins face across Europe. It combines three analyses: governance, socio-economic and social justice The governance analysis focuses on the requirements associated with the measures and the extent to which these requirements are met at the research sites. The socio-economic impact focuses on the efficacy of the measures in reducing the risks and the broad range of tools available to compare the measures on their societal impact. Finally, a tentative social justice analysis focuses on the distributive impacts of the adaptation measures. In the summary of results, we give an overview of the outcome of the different analyses. In the conclusion, we briefly assess the main pros and cons of the different analyses that were conducted. The main conclusion is that although the research sites were very different in both the challenges and the institutional context, the approach presented here yielded decision-relevant outcomes.

Improving Climate Resilience of Critical Assets: The ICARIA Project

“…Based on the successful past experiences gained from projects, such as BINGO [34], CoPs will be created in each case study region involving scientific experts; problem owners; other relevant local; regional, and national stakeholders; and citizens. Within these CoPs, collaboration and communication channels in local languages will be established to facilitate the dialogue and cooperation and improve governance, coordination, and knowledge transfer related to the multi-risk management and long-term resilience planning of infrastructures.…”

Assessment of climate change adaptation strategies in developing countries: the case of Burkina Faso

“…The Eco-Consultancy Chair at UQAC in Canada has developed a tool called the Sustainable Development Analysis Guide (SDAG). The SDAG is a systemic questioning tool based on six dimensions (social, ecological, economic, cultural, ethical and governance) that allows for an assessment of the degree of sustainability of a policy, strategy, programme or project (Villeneuve et al, 2016).…”