Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method

Carrillo, Pável Anselmo Álvarez; Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto; Frej, Eduarda Asfora; Almeida, Adiel Teixeira de

doi:10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y

Cited by 23 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The FITradeoff method has been proposed to solve several types of problematic, such as choice problematic (de Almeida et al, 2016), ranking problematic (de Almeida et al, 2019), sporting problematic (Kang et al, 2020), and portfolio problematic (Frej et al, 2021). In this context, several applications using this method are presented in the literature (Roselli & de Almeida 2021;Camilo et al 2020;Pergher et al, 2020;Santos et al, 2020;Fossile et al, 2020;Kang et al, 2020;Kang et al, 2018;Carrillo et al, 2018;Frej et al, 2017).…”

Section: Fitradeoff Methods For Portfolio Problematicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of the Fitradeoff Method in a Portfolio Problem in the Context of Reverse Logistics for Wholesale

Roselli

2023

Pesqui. Oper.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study investigates options to support the reverse logistics for wholesalers in a company. This big company, which do not have the name presented in this paper aims to improve the process of returning unsold items. At the moment, the process contained several rework-related losses. Hence, in this study two methodologies have been applied. The VFT has been used to structure the problem considering the multiple objectives presented by the Decision-Maker, in special those that are considered by sporting multinational. Also, the FITradeoff method has been used to identify the alternatives that should compose the portfolio of options concerning the reverse logistics. The portfolio problematic has been applied since it has been desired to obtain the subset of option to support the problem, constrained by monetary resources. Using the VFT, ten alternatives which were evaluated in ten criteria have been defined, and support by the FITradeoff method. As result, the alternatives five alternatives have been selected to compose the portfolio.

show abstract

Section: Fitradeoff Methods For Portfolio Problematicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of the Fitradeoff Method in a Portfolio Problem in the Context of Reverse Logistics for Wholesale

Roselli

2023

Pesqui. Oper.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Frej et al ( 2017) explored the FITradeoff method to solve a supplier selection problem of packaging material in a food industry. This method has also been applied to deal with problems in the energy sector (Kang et al, 2018;Fossile et al, 2020); scheduling rules selection (Pergher et al, 2020), agricultural sector (Alvarez Carrillo et al, 2018); textile sector (Rodrigues et al, 2020), among other application fields. Recently, de Almeida et al ( 2021) proposed a different approach for the FITradeoff decision process which combinates two preference modeling paradigms: elicitation by decomposition and holistic evaluation, in order to improve the decision process.…”

Section: Previous Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outsourcing Laboratory Services From a Colombian Agricultural Research Company Using the Fitradeoff Method Under Multiple Stakeholders Analysis

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since most of the studies about outsourcing are focused on mathematical models, this paper seeks to support from theoretical bases the use of partial information to ease the decision-making process; the practical contribution is to apply the FITradeoff method for solving a multicriteria problem of an agricultural research company that seeks to decide about the need to outsource the operation in case to overhead the limited capacity of the analysis services. After the FITradeoff method was applied to elicit preferences from each decision-maker (DM), the results show whether or not it would be feasible to outsource a given service, and what the most promising options are. The method required the DMs to answer in less time only a few questions, which avoided placing an unnecessary cognitive burden on them and proved to be useful in assisting DMs in the decision-making.

show abstract

“…The FITradeoff method has been widely applied for solving several practical decision problems in the most varied areas, such as the energy sector (Fossile et al, 2020;Kang et al, 2018;de Macedo et al, 2018); selection of agricultural technology packages (Carrillo et al, 2018); supplier selection (Frej et al, 2017); selection of strategic information systems (Gusmão & Medeiros, 2016); healthcare facility location (Dell'Ovo et al, 2017); water resources management (Monte et al, 2019); selection of scheduling rules (Pergher et al, 2020); textile sector (Rodrigues et al, 2020); information technology outsourcing decisions (Poleto et al, 2020); selection of triage systems in the healthcare sector (Camilo et al, 2020), among others. All these applications, however, focus on the FITradeoff process based on elicitation by decomposition without exploring the recently developed feature of holistic evaluations.…”

Section: Exploring the Combination Of Holistic Evaluation And Elicita...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Combination of Holistic Evaluation and Elicitation by Decomposition in Fitradeoff: Prioritizing Cultural Tourism Products in Poland

Czekajski¹,

Wachowicz²,

Frej

2023

Pesqui. Oper.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the problem of the prioritization of cultural tourism products (CTP) in Czeladź, one of the post-industrial towns in southern Poland. For the decision analysis, the new flexibility features of the FITradeoff multiple criteria method will be explored. In particular, this paper focuses on the combination of two preference modeling paradigms in the decision process: elicitation by decomposition, in the consequences space; and holistic evaluation, in the alternatives space. The FITradeoff method is a multiple criteria decision method for preferences elicitation in additive aggregation models, that works based on partial information about the decision maker's preferences. The new decision process with the FITradeoff Decision Support System (DSS) will be explored and discussed in detail. The advantages of combination of two types of preference modeling are highlighted, with the possibility of shortening the decision problem with holistic judgments made based on graphical visualizations, saving time and effort from decision makers.

show abstract

Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method

Cited by 23 publications

References 23 publications

Application of the Fitradeoff Method in a Portfolio Problem in the Context of Reverse Logistics for Wholesale

Application of the Fitradeoff Method in a Portfolio Problem in the Context of Reverse Logistics for Wholesale

Outsourcing Laboratory Services From a Colombian Agricultural Research Company Using the Fitradeoff Method Under Multiple Stakeholders Analysis

Exploring the Combination of Holistic Evaluation and Elicitation by Decomposition in Fitradeoff: Prioritizing Cultural Tourism Products in Poland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About