2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40141-020-00274-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting, Administering, and Interpreting Outcome Measures Among Adults with Lower-Limb Loss: an Update for Clinicians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extensive experience gained in the use of the TUG test in subjects with motor difficulties provides a rationale for its use to evaluate mobility also in lower limb amputees, paying specific attention to the different motor tasks included in the test. The TUG test was validated in people with a lower limb amputation [ 15 , 16 ], showing significant increase in the total time required to travel the entire path, when compared with the times measured in non-amputees [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensive experience gained in the use of the TUG test in subjects with motor difficulties provides a rationale for its use to evaluate mobility also in lower limb amputees, paying specific attention to the different motor tasks included in the test. The TUG test was validated in people with a lower limb amputation [ 15 , 16 ], showing significant increase in the total time required to travel the entire path, when compared with the times measured in non-amputees [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, and if applied to dual‐task cost, pairwise comparisons may be sufficient to assess if a greater magnitude of change in performance between single‐task and dual‐task conditions is observed in PLLA relative to CN. To avoid underpowered studies that minimize the ability to observe a true effect, a priori sample size calculations should be reported and be based on effect sizes from similar published research or be informed by a protocol pilot. Although a demand exists for the assessment of balance and gait using instrumented technology, future research on dual‐task testing using clinical tests is also important because of its clinical applicability. Currently, many clinical tests of mobility are available 13,14 ; however, the L Test of Functional Mobility remains the only test specifically designed for PLLA and for which a condition of dual‐task has been shown to be valid and reliable 24,29,30,62 . Dual‐task testing assesses cognitive‐motor capacity, and offers healthcare professionals the ability to examine situations resembling real life 22,23 that are often associated with experiences of falls 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsurprisingly, falls are also common in PLLA 9,10 and can have serious consequences that affect numerous aspects of life 11 . As most falls occur while walking, 12 the assessment of gait in PLLA is considered essential for tracking rehabilitation progress and successful community reintegration 13,14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FSST assesses dynamic balance through multidirectional stepping. 19 Participants complete a sequence of steps over 4 canes arranged in a “+” as fast as safely possible without touching the canes ( fig 1 ). 20 After demonstration, participants completed 1 practice and 2 timed trials (recorded in seconds, without examiner cueing for sequencing to avoid participant pacing).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%