2022
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2022.2077287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting a Within- or Between-Subject Design for Mediation: Validity, Causality, and Statistical Power

Abstract: Researchers with mediation hypotheses must consider which design to use: within-subject or between-subject? In this paper, I argue that three factors should influence design choice: validity, causality, and statistical power. Threats to validity include carry-over effects, participant awareness, measurement, and more. Causality is a core element of mediation, and the assumptions required for causal inference differ between the two designs. Between-subject designs require more restrictive no-confounder assumpti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also modeled work satisfaction and team effectiveness as dependent variables by estimating the change in these variables triggered by the same external event. We then used the MEMORE 3.0 macro for SPSS version 28 (Montoya, 2022) to analyze the data, using Model 16 that includes the moderating role of team size. The results of the overall moderated mediation analyses are presented in Figure 1 for work satisfaction and Figure 4 for team effectiveness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also modeled work satisfaction and team effectiveness as dependent variables by estimating the change in these variables triggered by the same external event. We then used the MEMORE 3.0 macro for SPSS version 28 (Montoya, 2022) to analyze the data, using Model 16 that includes the moderating role of team size. The results of the overall moderated mediation analyses are presented in Figure 1 for work satisfaction and Figure 4 for team effectiveness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing experiments with either a within-subject or a between-subject approach requires careful consideration of "validity," "causality," and "statistical power" [32]. For this study, a between-subject design was adopted due to its superior external validity.…”
Section: Experimental Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power for between-subjects mediation is determined by the following values: sample size; population effect size as set by path coefficients a , b , and c ′; α level; and the inferential method used (for discussion of factors to consider for mediation with repeated-measures designs, see Montoya, 2022). Estimating statistical power for mediation relies on the product of two regression coefficients that does not follow a normal distribution (Lomnicki, 1967), so power analyses using simulation methods are preferred for the indirect effect because of their ability to generate the nonnormal distribution of the product (Schoemann et al, 2017).…”
Section: Power Analysis In Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%