2018
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.785.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting a Technology to Increase well Capacity and Enhance Oil Recovery of the YUS<sub>1</sub><sup>1</sup> Formation of the Fainsk Oil Field

Abstract: To increase the development efficiency of reservoirs, methods to intensify inflows and enhance oil recovery are applied. The geological and field experience of applying these methods shows that a high technological effect can be reached in specific geological and geophysical conditions while in other conditions efficiency will be insignificant. In this relation, an important solution for this problem is the justification of selecting the most efficient technologies of stimulating pay zones. The research object… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 exhibits a visual foam performance test device used in this study. According to the experimental protocol, certain concentration of foaming agent solution was pre-configured, and the foam was prepared by the Waring Blender experimental method (Aleksandrov et al, 2018). The air tightness of the experimental equipment was first evaluated, and then the foam evaluation device (Model: Foam Evaluator, China MSC Group, pressure range <32 MPa and temperature range <300 °C) was put into an oven thermostat (temperature range <300 °C).…”
Section: Screening and Evaluation Of Heat-resistant Foaming Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 exhibits a visual foam performance test device used in this study. According to the experimental protocol, certain concentration of foaming agent solution was pre-configured, and the foam was prepared by the Waring Blender experimental method (Aleksandrov et al, 2018). The air tightness of the experimental equipment was first evaluated, and then the foam evaluation device (Model: Foam Evaluator, China MSC Group, pressure range <32 MPa and temperature range <300 °C) was put into an oven thermostat (temperature range <300 °C).…”
Section: Screening and Evaluation Of Heat-resistant Foaming Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%