Selecting a Suitable Sustainable Construction Method for Australian High-Rise Building: A Multi-Criteria Analysis

Navaratnam, Satheeskumar

doi:10.3390/su14127435

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 67 publications

(103 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Modular buildings exhibit better life cycle performance in terms of lower GHG emission and embodied energy [160]. Recent studies showed that off-site prefabrication scores were highest for the high-rise building construction based on economic, social equity and environmental criteria [161].…”

Section: Modular Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmentally Friendly Smart Construction—Review of Recent Developments and Opportunities

Shufrin,

Pasternak,

Dyskin

2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern economic, social and environmental challenges require a new type of construction that ensures resilience, low construction costs and ease of maintenance. Material production, manufacturing of structural elements and final assembly should minimise the environmental impacts, such as greenhouse emissions and waste production. This review aims to identify the key routes of research and development required to address the environmental challenges the construction industry faces. It outlines recent advances and highlights the rising opportunities. The strategies with great perspectives include 3D concrete printing, prefabrication and modular construction, mortarless construction, development and utilization of sustainable, smart and composite materials, renewable energy systems and automation technologies including the Digital Twin technology. Hybrid approaches that combine traditional and novel construction methods present the greatest potential. Overall, collaboration between stakeholders is crucial in driving innovation and successfully implementing these advancements.

show abstract

Section: Modular Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmentally Friendly Smart Construction—Review of Recent Developments and Opportunities

Shufrin,

Pasternak,

Dyskin

2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Approximately 87% of waste generation in timber formworks can be avoided using prefabricated components [41]. The prefabricated construction method can also reduce labour costs and overall construction costs [42]. On-site construction time is also reduced as prefabricated parts are ready to be installed [39].…”

Section: Prefabricationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experts’ Perceptions of the Management and Minimisation of Waste in the Australian Construction Industry

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effective waste management has become a crucial factor in Australia because, from 1996 to 2015, the population increased by 28%, while Australia’s annual waste increased by 170%. In the period 2018–2019, Australia generated 27 Mt of construction demolition waste (44% of all waste). Although 76% of this waste is recycled, there has been a 61% increase in the rate of waste since 2006–2007. Therefore, minimising waste and prioritising waste management are necessary to build a circular economy. This study aims to identify the current waste minimisation perceptions in the Australian construction industry. A semi-structured interview was conducted with 50 industry experts focusing on four sectors (design/planning, building information modelling (BIM), material logistics, and prefabrication). The data were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively (Severity index). The result disclosed that the designers are the first contributor to waste minimisation, followed by the material suppliers/manufacturers. It is revealed that subjective attitude and the personal reluctance to exercise waste mitigation strategies are crucial. The outcome also indicated that BIM has the potential to minimise waste significantly. Overall, 15 key points were highlighted to consider for waste minimisation, and a conceptual framework was proposed. Therefore, identifying waste management’s current practices and the responsibility of industry personnel will help minimise waste and bring sustainable development.

show abstract

“…Studies on robotics and automation systems in the construction industry have focussed on their implementation, barriers, impacts and trends (Amici et al ., 2022; Navaratnam, 2022; Oke et al ., 2021; Trujillo and Holt, 2020; Akinradewo et al ., 2021; Cropp, 2021). However, mobile apps offer benefits, but there is a lack of literature on their capabilities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Apps as partial replacement for robotics and automation systems in construction health and safety management

Yankah,

Adjei,

Tieru

2024

FEBE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeRobotics and automation are successful in construction, health and safety, but costs and expertise hinder their use in developing nations. This study examined mobile apps as a more accessible and affordable alternative.Design/methodology/approachThis descriptive study explored the use of mobile apps in construction, health and safety management. It used a literature review to identify their availability, accessibility, and capabilities. The study consisted of four five stages: searching for relevant apps, selecting them based on versatility, examining their specific functions, removing untested apps and discussing their functions based on empirical studies.FindingsA comprehensive literature review identified 35 mobile apps that are relevant to health and safety management during construction. After rigorous analysis, eight apps were selected for further study based on their relevance, user friendliness and compliance with safety standards. These apps collectively serve 28 distinct functions, including first-aid training and administration, safety compliance and danger awareness, safety education and training, hazard detection and warnings.Practical implicationsThis study suggests that mobile apps can provide a cost-effective and readily accessible alternative to robotics and automation in health and safety management in construction. Further research is needed to accurately assess the efficacy of these apps in real-world conditions.Originality/valueThis study explored the use of apps in health and safety management, highlighting their diverse capabilities and providing a framework for project managers, contractors and safety officers to select suitable apps.

show abstract

Selecting a Suitable Sustainable Construction Method for Australian High-Rise Building: A Multi-Criteria Analysis

Cited by 6 publications

References 67 publications

Environmentally Friendly Smart Construction—Review of Recent Developments and Opportunities

Environmentally Friendly Smart Construction—Review of Recent Developments and Opportunities

Experts’ Perceptions of the Management and Minimisation of Waste in the Australian Construction Industry

Apps as partial replacement for robotics and automation systems in construction health and safety management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About