2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-011-9738-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected Trace Elements in the Sacramento River, California: Occurrence and Distribution

Abstract: The impact of trace elements from the Iron Mountain Superfund site on the Sacramento River and selected tributaries is examined. The concentration and distribution of many trace elements-including aluminum, arsenic, boron, barium, beryllium, bismuth, cadmium, cerium, cobalt, chromium, cesium, copper, dysprosium, erbium, europium, iron, gadolinium, holmium, potassium, lanthanum, lithium, lutetium, manganese, molybdenum, neodymium, nickel, lead, praseodymium, rubidium, rhenium, antimony, selenium, samarium, stro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average concentrations of four elements in the river acquired by active sampling at am and 5 pm from day 1 to 5 were 2.37 ± 0.02, 3.55 ± 0.04, 3.11 ± 0. 07, and 0.68 ± 0.02 μg L -1 for V, As, Sb and Mo, respectively, which were comparable to those found in the lagoon of Venice (the concentrations of V, As, Sb and Mo were 0.69-3.21, 1.42-2.27, 0.14-0.52, and 6.50-10.62 μg L -1 , respectively) (Turetta et al, 2005) and the Sacramento River in California (the concentrations of V, As, Sb and Mo and are 9.1, 2.8, 0.26, and 2.6 μg L -1 , respectively) (Taylor et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Application Of Sf-dgt Devices In Freshwater Rivermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The average concentrations of four elements in the river acquired by active sampling at am and 5 pm from day 1 to 5 were 2.37 ± 0.02, 3.55 ± 0.04, 3.11 ± 0. 07, and 0.68 ± 0.02 μg L -1 for V, As, Sb and Mo, respectively, which were comparable to those found in the lagoon of Venice (the concentrations of V, As, Sb and Mo were 0.69-3.21, 1.42-2.27, 0.14-0.52, and 6.50-10.62 μg L -1 , respectively) (Turetta et al, 2005) and the Sacramento River in California (the concentrations of V, As, Sb and Mo and are 9.1, 2.8, 0.26, and 2.6 μg L -1 , respectively) (Taylor et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Application Of Sf-dgt Devices In Freshwater Rivermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, a significant fraction of the nominally dissolved (i.e. filter passing) W is in fact associated with Fe III oxyhydroxide colloids, whereas Mo is carried mainly as truly dissolved MoO 4 2-(aq) (Pokrovsky and Schott, 2002;Stolpe et al 2005;Taylor et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these estimates are reasonable, then these data could support a significant fluvial source of these elements. We were not able to find published Y and La concentrations in rivers in the northeastern United States, so instead we compare with river concentrations in Wales [ Neal , ], the eastern UK [ Neal , ], and the Sacramento River area [ Taylor et al ., ] to have a general idea of possible riverine concentrations for these elements. Of the 39 rivers and tributary sampling locations in those studies, only two had a La concentration above 822 pmol/kg; the median concentration for analyzed rivers in Wales, the eastern UK, and in the Sacramento area was 196, 420, and 36 pmol/kg, respectively; and the overall median concentration was 280 pmol/kg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%