2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected Schizosaccharomyces pombe Strains Have Characteristics That Are Beneficial for Winemaking

Abstract: At present, wine is generally produced using Saccharomyces yeast followed by Oenococus bacteria to complete malolactic fermentation. This method has some unsolved problems, such as the management of highly acidic musts and the production of potentially toxic products including biogenic amines and ethyl carbamate. Here we explore the potential of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe to solve these problems. We characterise an extensive worldwide collection of S. pombe strains according to classic biochem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
104
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the combined use of two no Saccharomyces strain allow to reduce the value of all measured BAs in comparison with the use of Saccharomyces + malolactic fermentation with particular reference to HIS and PUT (0.44 vs. 1.46 mg/L and 1.71 vs. 2.18 mg/L, respectively). No significant differences were recorded in BAs levels when different Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains (JB899/Y470, JB917/CBS1057, JB873/NCYC3422 and V1) were tested [64]. These differences should be attributed to the ability of Schizosaccharomyces pombe to metabolize urea [65].…”
Section: Bas and Alcoholic Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the combined use of two no Saccharomyces strain allow to reduce the value of all measured BAs in comparison with the use of Saccharomyces + malolactic fermentation with particular reference to HIS and PUT (0.44 vs. 1.46 mg/L and 1.71 vs. 2.18 mg/L, respectively). No significant differences were recorded in BAs levels when different Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains (JB899/Y470, JB917/CBS1057, JB873/NCYC3422 and V1) were tested [64]. These differences should be attributed to the ability of Schizosaccharomyces pombe to metabolize urea [65].…”
Section: Bas and Alcoholic Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The comparison among control wines undergoing classical MLF and alternatively fermented wines showed that the latter were fruitier also containing less acetic acid and BAs. More recently, the same authors characterized many S. pombe strains by evaluating biochemical parameters of oenological interest [64]. Three genetically different S. pombe strains appeared suitable for winemaking.…”
Section: Bas and Malolactic Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has further been shown that some non-Saccharomyces species greatly improve the quality and sensorial properties of wine (Loureiro & Malfeito-Ferreira, 2003;Hornsey, 2007;Jolly et al, 2003a;2003b;Benito et al, 2016;Padilla et al, 2016;Renault et al, 2016;Benito et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of a yeast strain to degrade extracellular L-malate is dependent, among other reasons, for the efficient transport of the dicarboxylic acid into the cell. S. cerevisiae lacks an active transport system for L-malate and extracellular L-malate enters the cells by means of simple diffusion ( Figure 2A1); Moreover, the malic enzyme of S. cerevisiae has a considerably lower substrate affinity for L-malate (Km = 50 mM) [21]; and the S. cerevisiae malic enzyme is mitochondrial, whereas the S. pombe malic enzyme is cytosolic [36].…”
Section: Uptake Of Malic Acid Into the Yeast Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%