Selected Risk Factors of Developmental Delay in Polish Infants: A Case-Control Study

Drozd-Dąbrowska, Marzena; Trusewicz, Renata; Gańczak, Maria

doi:10.3390/ijerph15122715

Cited by 15 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Marzena Drozd-Dabrowska [17] confirmed that breastfeeding was related to lower risk of developmental delay in surveyed children, with similar results published by others. Additionally, breastfeeding was reported as an independent effect in relation to the developmental status at the 12th month of life [18].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

History Information’s are Indispensable in Developmental Assessment of Children

Demerdzieva

Pop‐Jordanova

2020

Prilozi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstractFor achieving the good health and wellbeing for all children, the main role of pediatrician and other health care professionals is to follow their development.We implemented developmental monitoring for 465 children at the age of 12 - 60 months, in the period of 4 years (2016 - 2019), using standard algorithm in which start is always with child history. It should be comprehensive, and must include a detailed prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal history.Obtained results showed that 16.13% of participants have some serious illness in family history, and the same percentage (16.13%) manifested serious perinatal problems which imposed the support in intensive care unit. Breastfeed are 49,46 % of children. Only 7,53 % are not completely vaccinated.About the parameters for the development, we obtained that 11,83 % were not walking at the time of the assessment, and 65,81 % were not speaking. Toilet control was negative, and in 75,27 % they still were wearing diapers.Allergic manifestations at the time when the assessment was done is present in 8,60%. Finally, serious illness in child past history was positive in 19.35 % of evaluated sample.We concluded that a good history is needed and indispensable in the assessment process, particularly when exogenous causes are identified as the risk for the developmental delay. Obtained positive answers are directory for further investigation as well to correlate risk-consequences relationship.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

History Information’s are Indispensable in Developmental Assessment of Children

Demerdzieva

Pop‐Jordanova

2020

Prilozi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…During infancy, motor performance is a reliable manifestation of the functionality and integration of the central nervous system (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Hence, the monitoring of infant motor development allows for detecting delays and disturbances and enabling, if necessary, early therapeutic interventions to prevent further structural and functional disorders (6).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Polish Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Cultural Adaptation and Validation

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is a diagnostic tool for the assessment of the motor performance of infants from the time of birth, to the period of independent walking (0–18 months). This study aims to derive a Polish version of the AIMS through its cultural adaptation and validation. The study included 145 infants aged 0–18 months, who were divided into four further age groups: 0–3 months, 4–7 months, 8–11 months, and older than 12 months. The validation was based on an analysis of intrarater and interrater reliability values, as well as concurrent validity, using the gross motor scale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2). The total Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for intrarater reliability was 0.99 (ICC range in positions was 0.87–0.99, in subgroups was 0.91–0.99), while in particular positions, the ICC ranges were as follows: prone 0.97–0.99, supine 0.94–0.99, sitting 0.95–0.99, and standing: 0.63–0.99. The total ICC for interrater reliability was 0.99 (ICC range in positions was 0.98–0.99, in subgroups was 0.91–0.99), while in particular positions, the ICC ranges were as follows: prone 0.95–0.99, supine 0.93–0.96, sitting 0.93–0.98, standing 0.91–0.98. Only the standing position was analyzed for the subgroup of participants over 12 months old. The Spearman correlation between the Polish version of the AIMS and the gross motor scale of PDMS-2 was significant in the total population (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001) and in subgroups (r = 0.79–0.85, p < 0.0001). The results of our study confirm that the Polish version of the AIMS is reliable for infants aged 0–18 months and can be applied to this population for clinical and scientific purposes.Trial RegistryClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05264064, URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ct2/show/NCT05264064.

show abstract

“…In this study it was found that infants with birth weight of less than 2500gm were three times more likely to develop developmental delay as compare to infants with normal birth weight. [14] In another recent study by Pirhadi et al from Iran, the authors studied the relation of birth weight to the occurrence of developmental delay in children aged 4 to 16 months. In the study it was found that LBW of the child was associated with developmental delay in domains of fine motor movements, problem solving and total scores as assessed by ASQ.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biological Risk Factors and Early Developmental Delay Assessment in Infants Using Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Version 3 (ASQ-3)

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Development during early years of life is very crucial in the context of overall development of an individual. This is especially true for infants who have biological risk factors for maldevelopment. This study aimed to find the association of biological risk factors and developmental delay in infants aged 3-18 months. Materials and Methods: For this study, enrolment of 460 infants was done in the age group of 3-18 months who were attending Immunization Clinic in district level Civil Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab. Developmental assessment in the five areas including Gross motor, Fine motor, Communication, Problem solving and Personal-social development was done using a standardized tool called Ages and Stages Questionnaire, version 3 (ASQ-3). Results: Most of the study subjects viz., 426 (92.6%) were born full term whereas 34 (7.3%) infants were born preterm. Mean birth weight of infants was 2.9 ± 0.387 kgs. Out of the total, 259 (56.3%) study subjects were males and 201(43.7%) were females. Biological risk factors like gestation age and birth weight had statistically significant association with all domains of developmental delay except in the area of personal social development. On the other hand, gender had no association with any domain of developmental delay. Conclusion: Gestation age and birth weight are the typical risk factors having significant impact on all domains of developmental delay except for the personal social delay. However, gender of infant had no association with developmental delay. Keywords: Infant, Gestation age, birth weight, Developmental delay, ASQ.

show abstract

Selected Risk Factors of Developmental Delay in Polish Infants: A Case-Control Study

Cited by 15 publications

References 31 publications

History Information’s are Indispensable in Developmental Assessment of Children

History Information’s are Indispensable in Developmental Assessment of Children

The Polish Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Cultural Adaptation and Validation

Biological Risk Factors and Early Developmental Delay Assessment in Infants Using Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Version 3 (ASQ-3)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About