Selected regional competitiveness assessment models

Chrobocińska, Katarzyna

doi:10.14254/2223-3822.2016.14-1.1

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Source literature offers multiple concepts of competitiveness, which present the mechanism of this phenomenon and the determinants affecting success in the competitive process. Studies on regional competitiveness describe the following models: the decomposition model [40][41][42], the pyramid model [43][44][45], the European Competitiveness Index (ECI) [11], the competitiveness hat, competitiveness factors of the World Economic Forum (WEF), International Management Development Institute (IMD), the World Bank, the assessments of competitive ability of Bieńkowski and the National Competitiveness Council of Ireland [15,[46][47][48][49][50]. Some models, such as the Porter's Diamond, frame a competitiveness assessment on the microeconomic scale [51,52].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Regional Competitiveness in Poland from 2010–2019 in the Context of the Concept of Sustainable Development

Chrobocińska

2021

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The stimulation of regional competitiveness is a difficult and complex process that leads to the achievement of a competitive position against other regions covered in the comparison. The study includes a comparative analysis taking into account the Regional Competitiveness Index (RCI) level of voivodeships in Poland in 2010–2019 and, as a supplement, a Multi-Dimensional Comparative Analysis and cluster analysis. This made it possible to select a group of voivodeships characterized by a stable and relatively highly competitive position compared to the rest (voivodeships: Mazowieckie, Śląskie, Wielkopolskie, and Dolnośląskie). The apparent spatial disparity in the competitiveness of Polish voivodeships may be a result of long-term socioeconomic processes (such as sparse urbanization and industrialization), the polarized growth of competition leaders and the adverse effects of such polarization, i.e., the draining of competitive potential (such as qualified staff) from neighboring voivodeships.

show abstract