2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected movement and force pattern differences in rail- and rung-climbing of fire apparatus aerial ladders at 52.5° slope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, Hung [1] evaluated the effect of a designed "walk-through" extension ladder based on the kinetic behaviour and externally induced destabilizing forces on the ladder during the transition to elevation. Fall accidents still become the primary issue of ladder use due to structural safety features [6], loss of lateral stability [7], [8], suboptimal ladder inclination [9], [10], and lack of training and instruction system [11], [12]. Some biomechanical analyses result in an ergonomic hazard during ladder climbing tasks [13]- [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, Hung [1] evaluated the effect of a designed "walk-through" extension ladder based on the kinetic behaviour and externally induced destabilizing forces on the ladder during the transition to elevation. Fall accidents still become the primary issue of ladder use due to structural safety features [6], loss of lateral stability [7], [8], suboptimal ladder inclination [9], [10], and lack of training and instruction system [11], [12]. Some biomechanical analyses result in an ergonomic hazard during ladder climbing tasks [13]- [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%