2003
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2003-00307-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selected elevation in quantum tunnelling

Abstract: The tunneling through an opaque barrier with a strong oscillating component is investigated. It is shown, that in the strong perturbations regime (in contrast to the weak one), higher perturbations rate does not necessarily improve the activation. In fact, in this regime two rival factors play a role, and as a consequence, this tunneling system behaves like a sensitive frequency-shifter device: for most incident particles' energies activation occurs and the particles are energetically elevated , while for spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that activation is not an optimal method to increase the mean current; however, they do show that the current can easily be controlled by changes in the frequency and therefore may be used in frequency effect devices [20,41].…”
Section: Advances In Condensed Matter Physicsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results suggest that activation is not an optimal method to increase the mean current; however, they do show that the current can easily be controlled by changes in the frequency and therefore may be used in frequency effect devices [20,41].…”
Section: Advances In Condensed Matter Physicsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, the ratio between the average current and the stationary one depends on a single complex parameter 0 (20). The maximum average current (⟨ ⟩ max ) is reached, within this adiabatic approximation, when the lower value of the resonance eigenbound state is equal to the incoming particle's energy, that is, for Ω = − ( 0 + Δ ) 2 /4, or Δ = 2 − 0 , for which case…”
Section: The Adiabatic Solutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations