Testing for Genetic Manipulation in Plants 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04904-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selectable and Screenable Markers for Rice Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also demonstrated that the sensitivity of plant cells to the selection agent depends upon the genotype, the explant type and the developmental stage. Most of studies have reported that hygromycin can be used as a more efficient selectable marker, compared to kanamycin, and that it is an effective agent in plant transformation, very efficient in terms of regeneration, does not inhibit regeneration and does not affect the subsequent fertility of transgenic plants (Reynaerts et al 1988;Twyman et al 2002;Htwe et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also demonstrated that the sensitivity of plant cells to the selection agent depends upon the genotype, the explant type and the developmental stage. Most of studies have reported that hygromycin can be used as a more efficient selectable marker, compared to kanamycin, and that it is an effective agent in plant transformation, very efficient in terms of regeneration, does not inhibit regeneration and does not affect the subsequent fertility of transgenic plants (Reynaerts et al 1988;Twyman et al 2002;Htwe et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the hygromycin which can be applied at lower level than kanamycin, hygromycin appears an appropriate selective agent [66]. Similar results reported that hygromycin is an effective selective marker for genetic transformation for monocot plants such as rice [67,68], maize [69], and banana [70].…”
Section: Sugarcane -Technology and Researchmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It is commonly found that some selection systems are more effective in certain plant species and regeneration systems than others. An example is the lower efficiency of kanamycin resistance as a selection system in cereals than in dicots (Twyman et al 2002). E. pallida has lower shoot regeneration frequency with hygromycin (Table 2), and transgenic lines OSAG78-4 and OSAG78-6 had retarded shoot regeneration.…”
Section: Agrobacterium-mediated Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%