1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-6995(76)80024-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sélaciens nouveaux du London Clay de l'Essex (Yprésien du bassin de Londres)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Premontriea (Oxyscyllium) gilberti has been reported from early and middle Eocene deposits of Europe (Casier 1946;Cappetta 1976;Bor 1985;Adnet 2006) and central Asia (Case et al 1996). In North America, this species has been previously reported as Scyliorhinus gilberti from the Ypresian of Virginia (Kent 1999a), Georgia (Parmley and Cicimurri 2003), and Mississippi (Case 1994).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Premontriea (Oxyscyllium) gilberti has been reported from early and middle Eocene deposits of Europe (Casier 1946;Cappetta 1976;Bor 1985;Adnet 2006) and central Asia (Case et al 1996). In North America, this species has been previously reported as Scyliorhinus gilberti from the Ypresian of Virginia (Kent 1999a), Georgia (Parmley and Cicimurri 2003), and Mississippi (Case 1994).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both extant genera ( Manta and Mobula ) have fossil representatives. Between five and nine fossil genera have usually been attributed to mobulids depending on the points of view of palaeoichthyologists, and consist of the following genera: † Paramobula Pfeil, 1981, † Eomobula Herman, Hovestadt‐Euler & Hovestadt, 1989, † Eomanta Pfeil, 1981, † Eoplinthicus Cappetta & Stringer, 2002, † Plinthicus Cope, 1869, † Burhmania Cappetta, 1976, and possibly † Archaeomanta Herman, 1979, † Cretomanta Case, Tokaryk & Baird, 1990, and † Brachyrhizodus Romer, 1942.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarks: This genus was erected on material originally placed in the genus Rhinoptera by Woodward (1889, formally as † Rhinoptera daviesi ). Cappetta (1976) attributed this material to a new genus amongst the mobulids on the basis of: an evident reduction of tooth size, an increase in file number (more than eight), and a fine ornamentation rarely planed on the concave occlusal surface, leading to a supposed lack of biomechanical stress as observable in teeth of filter‐feeders and contrary to the benthic batoids with grinding‐type dentition as the rhinopterids. † Burnhamia fetahi illustrates the extreme reduction in tooth size and one can clearly observe anterior cuspidate teeth, lacking in rhinopterid or myliobatid taxa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the teeth of mature males of recent Hexanchus , the principal cusp is elongated, a character also seen in fossil species. The misinterpretation of this character as being of specific significance has led to the description of H. hookeri Ward , which subsequently proved to be a junior synonym of H. agassizi Cappetta and perhaps H. gracilis Davis a likely junior synonym of H. microdon Agassiz 1835 (Adnet ). H. microdon is a name usually applied to small, wide fossil teeth, resembling those of the Recent species H. nakamurai Teng , from the late Cretaceous worldwide and from the Palaeogene in North Africa.…”
Section: Hexanchus Microdon (Agassiz 1835) Figure S–ymentioning
confidence: 99%