Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seizure Risk following Open and Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Intradural Skull Base Tumors

Abstract: Objectives The incidence of seizures following a craniotomy for tumor removal varies between 15 and 20%. There has been increased use of endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) for a variety of intracranial lesions due to its more direct approach to these pathologies. However, the incidence of postoperative seizures in this population is not well described. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing EEA or open craniotomy for resection of a cranial base … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TCAs were advocated for use in laterally extending or purely intraventricular tumors. However, recent literature has shown endoscopic surgery for craniopharyngiomas with intraventricular extension shows similar outcomes to transcranial surgery [ 25 26 ]. Similarly, CSF leak rates were brought down with the use of nasoseptal flaps in this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCAs were advocated for use in laterally extending or purely intraventricular tumors. However, recent literature has shown endoscopic surgery for craniopharyngiomas with intraventricular extension shows similar outcomes to transcranial surgery [ 25 26 ]. Similarly, CSF leak rates were brought down with the use of nasoseptal flaps in this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it must be emphasized that similar to other rare complications after endonasal surgery, 23 very little is still known about the risk factors associated with SPH. Although tumor size and apoplexy may increase risk, there are likely other undiscovered risk factors, and more research is needed to understand the pathogenesis of such a serious complication.…”
Section: Limitations and Generalizabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] The endonasal route has gained an important role in the surgical management of these lesions because it provides a strict midline approach with bilateral visualization of and unobstructed access to the optic chiasm. 1,7 Dissection of the tumor off the optic chiasm can potentially cause visual loss and while risk factors have been studied, [8][9][10][11][12] early identification of cases with likely postoperative deficits remains a challenge. Previous research has attempted to use intraoperative visual evoked potentials to assess optic function in real-time, but the results have remained inconclusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%