Seismicity Map of Eastern Russia, 1960-2010

Mackey, K. G.; Fujita, Kazuya; Hartse, Hans E.; Stead, Richard; Steck, Lee K.; Gunbina, L. V.; Leyshuk, N.; Shibaev, Sergey; Козьмин, Б. М.; Imaev, V. S.; Гордеев, Е. И.; Чебров, В. Н.; Masal'ski, O. K.; Гилева, Н. А.; Bormatov, V. A.; Voitenok, A. A.; Levin, Yu.N.; Fokina, T.

doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.5.761

Cited by 25 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…events in the ISC Bulletin but not used for ISC hypocenter determination, except the special case described in Fig. 10b and Table 1b. NERS (MSUGS)-historical bulletin of Magadan seismic network, USSR Academy of Sciences, courtesy of Kevin Mackey, Michigan State University, Department of Geological Sciences (Mackey et al 2010 …”

Section: Abbreviationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rebuild of the Bulletin of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), part 1: 1964–1979

Storchak¹,

Harris²,

Brown³

et al. 2017

Geosci. Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The data from the Bulletin of the International Seismological Centre (ISC) have always been and still remain in demand for a wide range of studies in Geosciences. The unique features of the Bulletin include long-term coverage (1904-present), the most comprehensive set of included seismic data from the majority of permanent seismic networks at any given time in the history of instrumental recording (currently ~ 150) and homogeneity of the data and their representation. In order to preserve this homogeneity, the ISC has followed its own standard seismic event processing procedures that have not substantially changed until the early 2000s. Several considerable and necessary advancements in the ISC data collection and seismic event location procedures have created a need to rebuild the data for preceding years in line with the new procedures. Thus was set up a project to rebuild the ISC Bulletin for the period from the beginning of the ISC data till the end of data year 2010. The project is known as the Rebuild of the ISC Bulletin. From data month of January 2011, the ISC data have already been processed with the fully tested and established new procedures and do not require an alteration. It was inconceivable even to think about such a project for many tens of years, but great advances in computer power and increased support by the ISC MemberInstitutions and Sponsors have given us a chance to perform this project. Having obtained a lot of experience on the way, we believe that within a few years the entire period of the ISC data will be reprocessed and extended for the entire period of instrumental seismological recordings from 1904 till present. The purpose of this article is to describe the work on reprocessing the ISC Bulletin data under the Rebuild project. We also announce the release of the rebuilt ISC Bulletin for the period 1964-1979 with all seismic events reprocessed and relocated in line with the modern ISC procedures, ~ 68,000 new events, 255 new stations, ~ 815,000 new seismic phases, more robust and reliable mb and M S magnitude evaluations and the addition of ~ 2700 new M S magnitudes.

show abstract

Section: Abbreviationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rebuild of the Bulletin of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), part 1: 1964–1979

Storchak¹,

Harris²,

Brown³

et al. 2017

Geosci. Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Эти события связаны с торцовым столкновением с последней крайнего западного сегмента дуги -узкого Командорского блока [Гор деев и др., 2004;Geist, Scholl, 1994;Gordeev et al, 2006;Mackey et al, 2010]. Сейсмичность района по луострова Камчатский имеет определенные отли чия от каждой из двух примыкающих сейсмофо кальных зон и не может быть отнесена ни к одной из них.…”

Section: пространственное распределение сейсмичности в регионеunclassified

“…Северная граница Берингии проводится по Корякскому сейсмическому поясу [Ландер и др., 1994;Mackey, 2010]. Широкая полоса редкой (если исключить афтершоки) рассеянной сейсмичности охватывает практически все Корякское нагорье, продолжаясь на север через Анадырский залив и Чукотский п ов к Аляске, а на юг, вдоль камчатско го шельфа, -к области сочленения Алеутской дуги и Камчатки.…”

Section: литосферная плита берингияunclassified

Берингия: cейсмическая опасность и фундаментальные вопросы геотектоники

Гордеев¹,

Пинегина²,

Ландер³

et al. 2015

Физ. Земли

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…South of the Kamchatsky Peninsula, the subducting Pacifi c plate typically generates lowangle reverse-fault earthquakes in a Benioffzone pattern, whereas on the Komandorsky segment of the Aleutian zone, right-lateral strike-slip earthquakes are prevalent (Gorbatov et al, 1997;Mackey et al, 2010). The seismicity of the junction area-the Kamchatsky Peninsula region-is neither Benioff zone nor transform, but is dominated by shallow, reverse and oblique-slip faulting.…”

Section: Seismicitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The analysis of existing seismological and geodetic data (Fedotov et al, 1985;Gordeev et al, 2006;Levin et al, 2002Levin et al, , 2006Levin, 2009;Mackey et al, 2010) shows that Kamchatsky Peninsula itself is situated in conditions of prevalent compression oriented NW-SE; directly offshore (to the east), the dominant mode of deformation is strike slip. Vertical displacements as expressed in the marine terraces are differentiated in space and in time by rate and in some cases by direction (Fig.…”

Section: Geodynamics As Refl Ected In Marine Terracesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A nexus of plate interaction: Vertical deformation of Holocene wave-built terraces on the Kamchatsky Peninsula (Kamchatka, Russia)

Pinegina¹,

Bourgeois²,

Kravchunovskaya³

et al. 2013

Geological Society of America Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceKamchatsky Peninsula lies within a complex meeting place of tectonic plates, in particular, the orthogonal interaction of the west-moving Komandorsky Island block with mainland Kamchatka. Examining the Holocene history of vertical deformation of marine wave-built terraces along the peninsular coast, we differentiated tectonic blocks undergoing uplift and tilting separated by zones of stable or subsided shorelines. We analyzed ∼200 excavations along >30 coastal profiles and quantified vertical deformation on single profiles as well as along the coast using paleoshorelines dated with marker tephras. For the past ∼2000 yr, the average rates of vertical deformation range from about -1 to +7 mm/yr. Uplift patterns are similar to those detected from historical leveling and from mapping of the stage 5e Quaternary marine terrace (ca. 120 ka). Average vertical deformation in the Holocene is highest for the shortest studied time period, from ca. A.D. 250 to 600, and it is several times faster than rates for marine oxygen isotope stage (MIS) 5e terraces. Vertical displacements observed along the coast are most likely coseismic and probably have included subsidence as well as uplift events. Because subsidence is generally associated with erosion, almost surely more prehistoric large earthquakes occurred than are recorded as topographic steps in these terraces. We suggest that the distribution of coastal uplift and subsidence observed along the Kamchatsky Peninsula coastline is qualitatively explained by the squeezing of the Kamchatsky Peninsula block between the Bering and Okhotsk plates, and the Komandorsky Island block

show abstract

Seismicity Map of Eastern Russia, 1960-2010

Cited by 25 publications

References 25 publications

Rebuild of the Bulletin of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), part 1: 1964–1979

Rebuild of the Bulletin of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), part 1: 1964–1979

Берингия: cейсмическая опасность и фундаментальные вопросы геотектоники

A nexus of plate interaction: Vertical deformation of Holocene wave-built terraces on the Kamchatsky Peninsula (Kamchatka, Russia)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About