1999
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model

Abstract: Seismic waveforms contain much information that is ignored under standard processing schemes; seismic waveform inversion seeks to use the full information content of the recorded wavefield. In this paper I present, apply, and evaluate a frequency-space domain approach to waveform inversion. The method is a local descent algorithm that proceeds from a starting model to refine the model in order to reduce the waveform misfit between observed and model data. The model data are computed using a full-wave equation,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
870
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,382 publications
(874 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
870
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 is typically an irregular surface, and hence, finding a global minimum can be challenging if not impossible. In this context, multi-scale techniques [4,9,32,35,40,48], combined with gradient preconditioning and regularization methods, have been developed to sequentially incorporate higher wavenumber information into the inverted model. This results in a reduction of local minima effects by means of either selecting increasing individual frequency samples (in frequency domain) or broadening a low-pass filter by increasing its corner frequency (in time domain).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 is typically an irregular surface, and hence, finding a global minimum can be challenging if not impossible. In this context, multi-scale techniques [4,9,32,35,40,48], combined with gradient preconditioning and regularization methods, have been developed to sequentially incorporate higher wavenumber information into the inverted model. This results in a reduction of local minima effects by means of either selecting increasing individual frequency samples (in frequency domain) or broadening a low-pass filter by increasing its corner frequency (in time domain).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, and given the number of parametres to be inverted, statistical methods such as Monte Carlo are still not applicable for large 3D problems, especially when high-frequency contents are involved. In this sense, the centre piece of FWI is the so-called adjoint method, which allows us to obtain the gradient of the misfit function for the current model by cross-correlating both incident and back-propagated wavefield [15,16,31,32,44]. With the gradient at hand, an iterative optimization problem can be set in order to find the model that fits best the field data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an additional regularization term is classically added to the inversion problem to make it well posed [50]. In addition to the velocity model, the source excitation is generally unknown and must be included as an unknown of the problem [35]. Provided that a good starting velocity model m s is available (good in the sense that smoothly represents the structure of the true velocity model), the minimization of the objective function (4) is in practice solved using a Newton type method (see [52] and references therein).…”
Section: Full-waveform Inversion As a Least-squares Global Optimizatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past three decades, most FWI techniques have been designed to recover only a P-wave velocity model because of the high computational cost (e.g., Gauthier et al, 1986;Pratt, 1999). The recent progress in high-performance computing and the improvement in data acquisition resulted in the extension of FWI to 2D and 3D acoustic and elastic transverse isotropic media with a vertical axis of symmetry (VTI) (e.g., Warner et al, 2013;Operto et al, 2014;Wu and Alkhalifah, 2016;Kamath et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%