Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 1979
DOI: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.46.129.1979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Velocities, Electrical Resistivities, Densities, and Porosities of Basalts from DSDP Leg 46

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basalt's formation-porosity relationships agree fairly well with those for material collected on Legs 46 and 51, 52, 53, and, to a lesser degree, Leg 37, if the pertinent data are replotted and a comparison is made using only the F = Φ~m relationship: for Leg 37 (Hyndman and Drury, 1977), typical m is about 2.5; for Leg 46 (Christensen et al, 1979), typical m is about 1.9 (Kirkpatrick's 1979 logging data appear to be anomalous, perhaps because his density-porosity data are not quantitative enough); and for Legs 51, 52, 53 Hamano, 1980), typical m is about 1.9. Figure 14, because there is not necessarily a corresponding horizontal velocity for each vertical velocity.…”
Section: Scatter Diagramssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The basalt's formation-porosity relationships agree fairly well with those for material collected on Legs 46 and 51, 52, 53, and, to a lesser degree, Leg 37, if the pertinent data are replotted and a comparison is made using only the F = Φ~m relationship: for Leg 37 (Hyndman and Drury, 1977), typical m is about 2.5; for Leg 46 (Christensen et al, 1979), typical m is about 1.9 (Kirkpatrick's 1979 logging data appear to be anomalous, perhaps because his density-porosity data are not quantitative enough); and for Legs 51, 52, 53 Hamano, 1980), typical m is about 1.9. Figure 14, because there is not necessarily a corresponding horizontal velocity for each vertical velocity.…”
Section: Scatter Diagramssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Other possible reasons for the difference in Leg 37 data are that (1) the induction log measured resistivity in a direction parallel to bedding; (2) different techniques were used in measuring the resistivity-Leg 37 data were laboratory-determined; (3) logs were incorrect; or (4) Site 462 basalts have greater pore-water salinities than one would expect. In general, it appears that the resistivities meas- ured by well logs tend to be lower in absolute value than the laboratory-measured resistivities; this seems to result from the logs including cracks and fractures in their sampling, as suggested by Christensen et al (1979), Kirkpatrick (1979), and Salisbury et al (1980), but also, in part, from the induction log resistivity being measured parallel to bedding. In Figure 20, formation factor versus porosity, the Archie (1942) equations agree with the data.…”
Section: Scatter Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third is a set of laboratory measurements of physical properties, including porosities, wet bulk densities, and P wave velocities measured at confining pressures of 20 and 600 MPa, in a suite of 188 basalt samples recovered by drilling at a variety of sites [Christensen et al, 1979[Christensen et al, , 1980[Christensen et al, , 1989Christensen and Lewis, 1983;Wilkens et al, 1983]. The fourth is a set of lab data for 84 diabase samples from Hole 504B [Christensen and Salisbury, 1985;Iturrino et al, 1995;Salisbury et al, 1996].…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep-sea basalt core samples for which the porosity is largely vesicular and thus poorly connected give values of a = 1 and m = 2 or slightly greater (Hyndman et al, this volume;Christensen et al, 1979). There is, however, considerable uncertainty in these values because of the difficulties involved in sample porosity measurement and the difficulty of resaturating the samples if they were ever allowed to dry before the resistivity measurements were made.…”
Section: Formation Porosity From Resistivity Logmentioning
confidence: 99%