Brandt (2015) and Birch, Cichowicz, and Grobbelaar (2015) recently undertook studies to determine the quality factor Q and attenuation parameter , which describe the attenuation of seismic waves with distance, for South African earthquakes and mining-related seismic events, respectively. Brandt (2015) derived an attenuation relation of Q( f ) 400f 0.7 , whereas Birch, Cichowicz, and Grobbelaar (2015) estimated the relation Q( f ) = 327f 0.81 for the Kaapvaal Craton. However, both these studies determined Q without knowledge of the near-surface attenuation, which is quantified by the factor k (kappa). The general decrease in amplitude of seismic waves caused by attenuation may be described by using the quality factor Q, as was proposed over 50 years ago (e.g. Havskov and Ottemöller, 2010b):where A 0 is the initial amplitude, A(t) the amplitude after the waves have travelled for time t, f represents the frequency, and Q( f) is the general frequency-dependent quality factor. Q has been observed to have strong regional variations in the crust and a frequency dependence of the form(e.g. Kvamme and Havskov, 1989;Kvamme, Hansen, and Bungum, 1995;Malagnini, Herrmann, and Koch, 2000) when f > 1 Hz and Q( f ) is nearly constant for 0.1 Hz < f < 1.0 Hz (e.g. Stein and Wysession, 2003). The frequency dependence is often found to be stronger with increasing tectonic activity and is thought to be related to the decrease in homogeneity within the crust (e.g. Kvamme and Havskov, 1989;Birch, Cichowicz, and Grobbelaar, 2015). Q is also thought to be mostly constant along the ray path for local seismology observations, with the exception of the near-surface layers (1-3 km), which generally have a much lower Q than the rest of the path and tend to filter out high-frequency energy between 5-25 Hz (e.g. Havskov and Ottemöller, 2010b). The attenuation term in Equation [1] may be separated into surface and deeper crust effects: [3] with k representing the near-surface attenuation. The parameter k describes the asymptotic high-frequency slope of the spectrum of a seismogram. A low value for k corresponds to a seismogram with abundant high-frequency energy, whereas a high value corresponds to a minimal amount of highfrequency energy (Kilb et al., 2012). Kappa varies with region (stable continental area vs. Kappa, near-surface attenuation, mining-related seismic event, spectral analysis.