1994
DOI: 10.1029/94jb00059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic signature and geochemistry of an island arc: A multidisciplinary study of the Kohistan accreted terrane, northern Pakistan

Abstract: Systematic sampling and mapping in the Kohistan accreted arc terrane of northern Pakistan has provided a sample suite representing the lithologic diversity of the section from its base along the Main Mantle Thrust upward through several stacked intrusions and their metamorphosed equivalents into the Kohistan batholith. A new lithologic column for the terrane has been developed during the course of this study using geothermobarometry based on elemental exchange reactions calculated from electron microprobe anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
112
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(36 reference statements)
15
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining preserved crustal thicknesses are 18 km thickness for the Talkeetna arc (Greene et al, 2006), 15 km for the Bonanza arc (Canil et al, 2010), and about 8.3 km for the Canyon Mountain complex (Pearcy et al, 1990). The Kohistan arc is believed to be entirely preserved in crustal thickness (Miller and Christensen, 1994;Petterson, 2010). Interestingly, the estimated original crustal thicknesses of these accreted terranes are significantly larger than the average thickness of modern island arcs, most likely because of the large uncertainty and often lack of constraints in estimating the depth of crystallization.…”
Section: Island Arcs: Accreted Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining preserved crustal thicknesses are 18 km thickness for the Talkeetna arc (Greene et al, 2006), 15 km for the Bonanza arc (Canil et al, 2010), and about 8.3 km for the Canyon Mountain complex (Pearcy et al, 1990). The Kohistan arc is believed to be entirely preserved in crustal thickness (Miller and Christensen, 1994;Petterson, 2010). Interestingly, the estimated original crustal thicknesses of these accreted terranes are significantly larger than the average thickness of modern island arcs, most likely because of the large uncertainty and often lack of constraints in estimating the depth of crystallization.…”
Section: Island Arcs: Accreted Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Only a few accreted island arc terranes (i.e., Talkeetna, Bonanza, Kohistan, Canyon Mountain, and El Paxtle arcs) contain parts of all of the original crustal layers, but these accreted layers are severely thinned. Geobarometric and geologic studies suggest original crustal thicknesses of 30-35 km for the Talkeetna arc (Greene et al, 2006;Hacker et al, 2008), 24 km for the Bonanza arc (Canil et al, 2010), 45 km for the Kohistan arc (Miller and Christensen, 1994), and about 30 km for the Canyon Mountain complex (Pearcy et al, 1990). The remaining preserved crustal thicknesses are 18 km thickness for the Talkeetna arc (Greene et al, 2006), 15 km for the Bonanza arc (Canil et al, 2010), and about 8.3 km for the Canyon Mountain complex (Pearcy et al, 1990).…”
Section: Island Arcs: Accreted Examplesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, such melts have been successfully obtained in melting experiments with variable Ca-rich pyroxene + olivine + amphibole assemblages at 0.5-1 GPa and temperatures of 1175-1350°C (Médard et al, 2004(Médard et al, , 2006. Such assemblages are observed as parts of exposed old arc ultramafic/ mafic cumulate complexes in the Talkeetna area, Alaska (DeBari and Coleman, 1989;DeBari and Sleep, 1991;Kelemen et al, 2003), the Kohistan Terrane of North Pakistan (Khan et al, 1993;Miller and Christensen, 1994;Burg et al, 1998;Ringuette et al, 1999;Jagoutz et al, 2007), and the Ivrea Zone in North Italy (Mehnert, 1975;Rivalenti et al, 1984;Quick et al, 1994). These complexes have been interpreted to be remnants of magma chambers emplaced at the base of the crust, close to the upper mantle-lower crust transition.…”
Section: Origin Of the Ankaramitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This project was conceived based on success in investigating geochemical constraints on laboratory-measured compressionalwave velocities from other environments (e.g., Miller and Christensen, 1994). During this investigation, five primary questions regarding velocity behavior were identified: (1) Does bulk-rock chemistry, which reflects the diversity in lithologies recovered during Leg 147, demonstrate any correlative properties that can be used to interpret velocity behavior in the lower oceanic crust and upper mantle?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%